Reinforcement biases subsequent perceptual decisions when confidence is low, a widespread behavioral phenomenon

Author:

Lak Armin12ORCID,Hueske Emily345,Hirokawa Junya67ORCID,Masset Paul368ORCID,Ott Torben69,Urai Anne E610ORCID,Donner Tobias H10ORCID,Carandini Matteo2ORCID,Tonegawa Susumu411,Uchida Naoshige3ORCID,Kepecs Adam69

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

2. UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom

3. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

4. RIKEN-MIT Laboratory at the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory at Department of Biology and Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

5. McGovern Institute for Brain Research at Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

6. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United States

7. Graduate School of Brain Science, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, Kyoto, Japan

8. Watson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor, United States

9. Departments of Neuroscience and Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States

10. Department of Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

11. Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Abstract

Learning from successes and failures often improves the quality of subsequent decisions. Past outcomes, however, should not influence purely perceptual decisions after task acquisition is complete since these are designed so that only sensory evidence determines the correct choice. Yet, numerous studies report that outcomes can bias perceptual decisions, causing spurious changes in choice behavior without improving accuracy. Here we show that the effects of reward on perceptual decisions are principled: past rewards bias future choices specifically when previous choice was difficult and hence decision confidence was low. We identified this phenomenon in six datasets from four laboratories, across mice, rats, and humans, and sensory modalities from olfaction and audition to vision. We show that this choice-updating strategy can be explained by reinforcement learning models incorporating statistical decision confidence into their teaching signals. Thus, reinforcement learning mechanisms are continually engaged to produce systematic adjustments of choices even in well-learned perceptual decisions in order to optimize behavior in an uncertain world.

Funder

Wellcome

National Institutes of Health

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

RIKEN

JPB Foundation

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

German Academic Exchange Service

Harvard University

Publisher

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3