Affiliation:
1. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales
2. School of Psychology, University of Sydney
Abstract
How is new information organized in memory? According to latent state theories, this is determined by the level of surprise, or prediction error, generated by the new information: small prediction error leads to updating of existing memory, large prediction error leads to encoding of a new memory. We tested this idea using a protocol in which rats were first conditioned to fear a stimulus paired with shock. The stimulus was then gradually extinguished by progressively reducing the shock intensity until the stimulus was presented alone. Consistent with latent state theories, this gradual extinction protocol (small prediction errors) was better than standard extinction (large prediction errors) in producing long-term suppression of fear responses; and the benefit of gradual extinction was due to updating of the conditioning memory with information about extinction. Thus, prediction error determines how new information is organized in memory, and latent state theories adequately describe the ways in which this occurs.
Publisher
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Reference23 articles.
1. Fear reduced through unconditional stimulus deflation is behaviorally distinct from extinction and differentially engages the amygdala;Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science,2023
2. Context, Time, and Memory Retrieval in the Interference Paradigms of Pavlovian Learning;Psychological Bulletin,1993
3. Context and behavioral processes in extinction;Learning and Memory,2004
4. Occasional reinforced trials during extinction can slow the rate of rapid reacquisition;Learning and Motivation,2004
5. A flexible and generalizable model of online latent-state learning;PLoS Computational Biology,2019