US women screen at low rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer: a cross-sectional population-based observational study

Author:

Harper Diane M123ORCID,Plegue Melissa1,Jimbo Masahito14,Sheinfeld Gorin Sherri1,Sen Ananda15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan

3. Department of Women's and Gender Studies, University of Michigan

4. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois

5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan

Abstract

Background:Using screen counts, women 50–64 years old have lower cancer screening rates for cervical and colorectal cancers (CRC) than all other age ranges. This paper aims to present woman-centric cervical cancer and CRC screenings to determine the predictor of being up-to-date for both.Methods:We used the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), an annual survey to guide health policy in the United States, to explore the up-to-date status of dual cervical cancer and CRC screening for women 50–64 years old. We categorized women into four mutually exclusive categories: up-to-date for dual-screening, each single screen, or neither screen. We used multinomial multivariate regression modeling to evaluate the predictors of each category.Results:Among women ages 50–64 years old, dual-screening was reported for 58.2% (57.1–59.4), cervical cancer screening alone (27.1% (26.0–28.2)), CRC screening alone (5.4% (4.9–5.9)), and neither screen (9.3% (8.7–9.9)). Age, race, education, income, and chronic health conditions were significantly associated with dual-screening compared to neither screen. Hispanic women compared to non-Hispanic White women were more likely to be up-to-date with cervical cancer screening than dual-screening (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.39 (1.10, 1.77)). Compared to younger women, those 60–64 years are significantly more likely to be up-to-date with CRC screening than dual-screening (aOR = 1.75 (1.30, 2.35)).Conclusions:Screening received by each woman shows a much lower rate of dual-screening than prior single cancer screening rates. Addressing dual-screening strategies rather than single cancer screening programs for women 50–64 years may increase both cancer screening rates.Funding:This work was supported by NIH through the Michigan Institute for Clinical and61 Health Research UL1TR002240 and by NCI through The University of Michigan Rogel Cancer62 Center P30CA046592 grants.

Funder

NCATS

NCI

Publisher

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference44 articles.

1. Anderson J, Bourne D, Peterson K, Mackey K. 2019. Washington DC: Department of Veterans Affairs (US). Evidence Brief: Accuracy of Self-report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539386/.

2. Application of Behavioral Economics Principles Improves Participation in Mailed Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening;Bakr;Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology,2020

3. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2019 Codebook;Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System,2019

4. BlueCross Blue Shield of Texas;BlueCross Blue Shield of Texas,2020

5. Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Patterns Among Women With Medicaid and Commercial Insurance;Bonafede;American Journal of Preventive Medicine,2019

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3