Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences & Tsinghua Laboratory of Brain and Intelligence, Tsinghua University
Abstract
The fact that objects without proper support will fall to the ground is not only a natural phenomenon, but also common sense in mind. Previous studies suggest that humans may infer objects’ stability through a world model that performs mental simulations with a priori knowledge of gravity acting upon the objects. Here we measured participants’ sensitivity to gravity to investigate how the world model works. We found that the world model on gravity was not a faithful replica of the physical laws, but instead encoded gravity’s vertical direction as a Gaussian distribution. The world model with this stochastic feature fit nicely with participants’ subjective sense of objects’ stability and explained the illusion that taller objects are perceived as more likely to fall. Furthermore, a computational model with reinforcement learning revealed that the stochastic characteristic likely originated from experience-dependent comparisons between predictions formed by internal simulations and the realities observed in the external world, which illustrated the ecological advantage of stochastic representation in balancing accuracy and speed for efficient stability inference. The stochastic world model on gravity provides an example of how a priori knowledge of the physical world is implemented in mind that helps humans operate flexibly in open-ended environments.
Funder
Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission and Administrative Commission of Zhongguancun Science Park
Tsinghua University Guoqiang Institute
Tsinghua University Qiyuan Laboratory
Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence
The Shimu Tsinghua Scholar Program
Publisher
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Reference46 articles.
1. Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoning;Allen;PNAS,2020
2. How do infants learn about the physical world?;Baillargeon;Current Directions in Psychological Science,1994
3. Infants’ physical world;Baillargeon;Current Directions in Psychological Science,2004
4. Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding;Battaglia;PNAS,2013
5. Physion: evaluating physical prediction from vision in humans and machines;Bear,2021