Auditory confounds can drive online effects of transcranial ultrasonic stimulation in humans

Author:

Kop Benjamin R1ORCID,Shamli Oghli Yazan2,Grippe Talyta C2,Nandi Tulika3,Lefkes Judith1,Meijer Sjoerd W1,Farboud Soha1,Engels Marwan1,Hamani Michelle2,Null Melissa3,Radetz Angela3,Hassan Umair3,Darmani Ghazaleh2,Chetverikov Andrey14,den Ouden Hanneke EM4ORCID,Bergmann Til Ole35,Chen Robert2,Verhagen Lennart1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University Nijmegen

2. Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of Toronto

3. Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz

4. Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen

5. Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research Mainz

Abstract

Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) is rapidly emerging as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique. TUS is already well-established in animal models, providing foundations to now optimize neuromodulatory efficacy for human applications. Across multiple studies, one promising protocol, pulsed at 1000 Hz, has consistently resulted in motor cortical inhibition in humans (Fomenko et al., 2020). At the same time, a parallel research line has highlighted the potentially confounding influence of peripheral auditory stimulation arising from TUS pulsing at audible frequencies. In this study, we disentangle direct neuromodulatory and indirect auditory contributions to motor inhibitory effects of TUS. To this end, we include tightly matched control conditions across four experiments, one preregistered, conducted independently at three institutions. We employed a combined transcranial ultrasonic and magnetic stimulation paradigm, where TMS-elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) served as an index of corticospinal excitability. First, we replicated motor inhibitory effects of TUS but showed through both tight controls and manipulation of stimulation intensity, duration, and auditory masking conditions that this inhibition was driven by peripheral auditory stimulation, not direct neuromodulation. Furthermore, we consider neuromodulation beyond driving overall excitation/inhibition and show preliminary evidence of how TUS might interact with ongoing neural dynamics instead. Primarily, this study highlights the substantial shortcomings in accounting for the auditory confound in prior TUS-TMS work where only a flip-over sham and no active control was used. The field must critically reevaluate previous findings given the demonstrated impact of peripheral confounds. Furthermore, rigorous experimental design via (in)active control conditions is required to make substantiated claims in future TUS studies. Only when direct effects are disentangled from those driven by peripheral confounds can TUS fully realize its potential for research and clinical applications.

Funder

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Holland High Tech

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Boehringer Ingelheim Stiftung

Publisher

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3