Affiliation:
1. Department of Applied Psychology. GITAM (Deemed to be University) Visakhapatnam – 530045.
Abstract
The objective of the present study is to find the effects of Area of Residence, family structure on Adolescents' perceived parenting styles. A demographical study in Andhra Pradesh. Background: The rural population is more homogenous in social, racial, and psychological traits that negatively correlate with heterogeneity. (Most are agriculturists are directly connected with agriculture). More heterogeneous than rural. Urbanity and heterogeneity are positively co-related (Different population types are seen in cities, different places, religions, caste, class race, community, economic and cultural differences, occupations, and behavioural patterns are also different). Family structure is in the form of two types. Nuclear and joint families differ in the support that each inherently offers, affecting adolescents' behaviour. Method: present study sampled 1208 male and female high school seniors from three schools in Andhra Pradesh and Area of residence, family structure relationship to parenting styles. Seniors completed a demographic survey that gathered family structure information and the number of disciplinary incidents, and they also completed a parenting style survey that measured parents parenting modes. R.L.Bharadwaj seven parenting styles tool administered to respondents in order to find the middle adolescents perceived parenting styles. Conclusion: the study found that adolescents from urban and rural, semi-urban showed a significant difference in lenient standards and moralism practices. Analysis revealed that adolescents living with joint and nuclear families using a neglecting parenting style were less likely to receive disciplinary incidents compared to adolescents living with joint family structure. Previous research suggested that an authoritative parenting style tends to benefit adolescents regardless of the family structure. Implications Present study results summarize that area of residence (Rural, Urban, and Semi-urban) showed significant differences in Andhra Pradesh middle adolescents' perceived parenting styles. The study implies that nuclear family middle adolescents perceiving parenting style significantly differed on neglecting to a parent than joint family respondents perceiving parenting style.
Reference11 articles.
1. Abubakar, A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Suryani, A. O., Handayani, P., and Pandia, W. S. (2014). Perceptions of parenting styles and their associations with mental health and life satisfaction among urban Indonesian adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24 (9), 2680-2692. DOI 10.1007/s10826-014-0070.
2. Abdullah Fathur Rasyid , Alfia Maulina Sandry Parenting Style of Urban Versus Rural CommunitiesinIndonesia.https://www.academia.edu/50950046/Parenting Style of Urban Versus_Rural_Communities_in_Indonesia.
3. Ali, H., and Purwandi, L. (2016). Indonesia 2020: The urban middle class millennial. Alvara Research Center. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Hasil sensus penduduk 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik. Diakses 16 Juni 2021 dari https:// www.bps. go.id/press release /2021 /0 1/21/1854/hasil-sensuspenduduk-2020.html.
4. Bryce Summers (2006) the effects of family structure and parenting style on school disciplinary incidents of high school seniors. Submitted to the Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology and School Psychology and the faculty of the Graduate School of Wichita State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education.
5. Jamaludin, A. N. (2015). Sosiologi perdesaan. CV Pustaka Setia Nestya, M. (2013). Perbandingan Representasi Gaya Hidup Remaja Perkotaan Dalam Film “Catatan Si Boy 1987” Dan “Catatan Harian Si Boy 2011”. Jurnal e-Komunikasi, 1(3). Diakses 16 Juni 2021 dari http://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/ilmu-komunikasi/article/view/932.