Potential effect of Raw Honey on Gastric Mucosal Healing in Aspirin-induced Rats-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Potential effect of Raw Honey on Gastric Mucosal Healing in Aspirin-induced Rats

Published:2023-03-31 Issue: Volume: Page:1153-1160
ISSN:0974-360X
Container-title:Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology
language:en
Short-container-title:RJPT

Author:

Diah Wulansari Devyani¹,Kirtishanti Aguslina¹,Risa Risthanti Reine²,Dyah Wulandari Devyana³,Soetjipto Lili⁴,Winarni Dwi⁵

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

2. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

3. Medical Laboratory Technologyst Study Program, Faculty of Health, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

5. Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Abstract

Background: Raw honey is a natural ingredient which has a variety of nutrients that can be used for alternative treatments for peptic ulcer disease. This study was carried out to examine the antiulcer effects of Raw Honey against Aspirin induced gastritis in rats. Methodology: Wistar rats were separated into 6 groups. Aspirin suspension 200mg/kgBW was given orally to groups 2-6 for 2 days. Then, group 1 and 2 received carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), groups 3-5 were orally forced-fed with 3.5, 7, and 14mL/kgBW of raw honey, and group 6 received 100mg/kgBW Cimetidine. The tested animals were killed after receiving therapy for 15 days and the gastric mucosa was observed macroscopically of the ulcer index and microscopically through histopathological preparations. The antioxidant effect of raw honey was identified from the lipid peroxidation marker (MDA). Conclusion : Treatment with 7 and 14 ml/kgBW of raw honey promotes gastric mucosal repair based on the macroscopic and microscopic observations. Significant decreases in the levels of the lipid peroxidation marker (MDA) was observed. Significance was defined as p<0.05 compared to the ulcer control group (Group 6).

Publisher

A and V Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)

Reference57 articles.

1. Chisholm-Burns MA. et al. Pharmacotherapy : Principles and Practice. The British Journal of Psychiatry. United State: McGraw-Hill Education. 2016; 4th ed. doi: 10.1192/bjp.111.479.1009-a.

2. Zeind CS and Carvalho MG. Applied Therapeutics : The Clinical Use of Drugs. The British Journal of Psychiatry. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer. 2018; 11th ed. doi: 10.1192/bjp.112.483.211-a.

3. Kumar V, Abbas AK and Aster JC. Robbins Basic Pathology. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunder. 2013; 9th ed.

4. Wysock A. et al. Changes in the localization of perforated peptic ulcer and its relation to gender and age of the patients throughout the last 45 years’, World Journal of Surgery. 2011; 35(4), pp. 811–816. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0917-2.

5. Deding U. et al. Perceived stress as a risk factor for peptic ulcers: A register-based cohort study, BMC Gastroenterology. BMC Gastroenterology, 2016; 16(1), pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0554-9. Factors, R. 2016; 6(5), pp. 479–483.