Smear Layer removal efficacy of different types of Irrigation Solutions with single file system: An in vitro SEM Study

Author:

Varma K Madhu1,B Manishaa2,Satish R Kalyan1,Kumar M Sita Rama3,D B Panithini2,K Madhavi2

Affiliation:

1. Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College and Hospital, Bhimavaram 534201, Andhra Pradesh, India.

2. Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College and Hospital, Bhimavaram 534201, Andhra Pradesh, India.

3. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College and Hospital, Bhimavaram 534201, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of three different irrigating solutions (NaOCl+ EDTA, REMIX 2 IN 1, TWIN KLEEN) on the removal of smear layer with the single file system (XP-Endo Shaper) in mandibular premolars using a scanning electron microscope. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three human single-rooted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and decoronated to a standardized length. Biomechanical preparation was done with a single file system (XP-Endo Shaper) using 3% NaOCl as an irrigant during instrumentation. Three experimental groups were formed by randomly dividing teeth, with eleven teeth in each Group (n=11), and final irrigation was carried out using the following solutions; Group I - (control group) 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA), Group II - REMIX 2 IN 1 solution (Neelkanth healthcare, India), Group III - freshly prepared TWIN KLEEN (Maarc dental, India) solution. The teeth were separated into two halves and observed under a scanning electron microscope at 3mm, 6mm, and 9mm from the apex to analyze the amount smear layer in 1000X and were evaluated using a 5-grade scoring system. Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U test were used to analyze the data. Results: On comparing the three different irrigating solutions, no statistically significant difference was found in the ability to remove the smear layer from the coronal and middle third's (P>0.05). Group I (1.14±0.68) and Group II (1.18±0.40) showed significantly higher removal of smear layer when compared to Group III (1.81±0.60) in the apical third. Conclusion: Sequential use of 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA and REMIX 2 IN 1 solution were found to be the most efficient than TWIN KLEEN solution in removing the smear layer in the apical third of root canals instrumented with the single file system (XP-Endo Shaper).

Publisher

A and V Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3