To Compare the Effectiveness of Kegel’s Exercise and Paula Method in women with Urinary Incontinence

Author:

Rajalaxmi V.1,Swetha P.2,Balathandayutham K.3,Tharani G.4,Vaishnavi G.4,Sridevi G.5,Vendhan G.Venu6

Affiliation:

1. Professor, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai.

2. Physiotherapist, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai.

3. Lecturer, Annamalai University.

4. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai.

5. Professor, Department of Physiology, SRM Dental College, Chennai.

6. Principal, College of Allied Health Sciences, East Coast Institute of Health Sciences.

Abstract

Objective of The Study: The study aims to compare the effectiveness of Paula method and Kegel's exercise in women with urinary incontinence. Background of The Study: Pelvic floor muscle weakness is one of the cause for urinary incontinence. Conservative management such as pelvic floor muscle training and Paula method is commonly recommended as first-line therapy for women with urinary incontinence. The purpose of the study is to examine the efficacy of circular muscle strengthening (Paula method) as opposed to pelvic floor muscle training (PMFT) on stress urinary incontinence. Methodology: This study was a comparative study design with pre and post type with 40 subjects randomly divided into two groups (group A and group B). Group A received Kegel’s exercise and Group B received Paula method. Result: On comparing Pre test and Post test within Group A and Group B of ICIQ score, QOL score, sexuality questionnaire score shows highly significant difference in mean values at P ≤ 0.001. Conclusion: This study concludes that Paula method decreases frequency of urinary incontinence by strengthening sphincter muscles. Compared to the Kegel’s exercise, Paula method showed greater difference in decreasing the frequency of urinary incontinence.

Publisher

A and V Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3