Trigger Tool-Based Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions – A Prospective Observational Study

Author:

Anand K. Anjali1,Winson Pereira Ralph1,D. Shetty Runi1,Jain Praneetha2,P. S. Supriya3,Shetty Shraddha4

Affiliation:

1. Pharm D Interns, Department of Pharmacy Practice, NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru - 575018, India.

2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru - 575018, India.

3. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Father Muller Medical College, Mangaluru-575002, India.

4. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru -575018, India.

Abstract

Background: To prevent medication-related patient harm and improve healthcare safety and quality, the hospital needs to detect, report, and review adverse drug reactions (ADR) so that specific target safety interventions can be done. Triggers are clues or tools used to identify adverse events. Methodology: A prospective review of patient (n = 366) records using the Global Trigger Tool method was undertaken to detect ADRs for 6 months. The presence of ADRs was reviewed by three independent authors using 39 triggers, and the findings were validated by a physician and a clinical pharmacist. Data collected was entered in Excel and analyzed by using SPSS Version 29.0 Results: Among 366 patient records reviewed, 203 times triggers were observed; the most common trigger was antiemetics (32.02%). However, the most common trigger related to adverse effects was using the other medication module trigger (25.12%). A total of 47 ADRs were observed, of which 44 were associated with triggers, and three were reported spontaneously. The most common ADR was found to be constipation in 11 patients (23.40%), and the most common drug class associated with ADRs was observed to be antibiotics in 16 patients (34.04%). There was no association observed between the ADR and the patient-specific factors. Conclusion: The trigger tool can be a feasible method for identifying ADRs compared to the traditional ADR identification methods. To improve the quality of patient safety,trigger-tool-based identification of ADR can be used in routine settings.

Publisher

A and V Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3