Comparison between Rapid and Standard procedure Pleurodesis outcome in Malignant Pleural Effusion

Author:

Anang Marhana Isnin1,Dwi Wahyudi Andri1,Nur Rosyid Alfian1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Abstract

Background: The terminal stage of cancer with distant metastasis often concurrent with malignant pleural effusion (MPE), which is the complication in lung cancer cases. Pleurodesis was performed by inserting a sclerosing agent through the thoracal drain after the pleural fluid was evacuated. Objective: to determine whether rapid pleurodesis is more efficient and effective than the standard procedure pleurodesis in MPE patients. Methods: This experimental study using randomized posttest-only control group design and divided into two groups (standard procedure pleurodesis group and rapid pleurodesis group). All of the samples were inpatient with MPE requiring pleurodesis and eligible with the inclusion criteria as samples. Pleurodesis procedure was performed by inserting a sclerosing agent through the thoracic drain after fluid well evacuated using talc slurry, and evaluated 1 month after pleurodesis procedure. All data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: A total of 25 samples were included in this study. Our study suggests that standard procedure findings were the same as the rapid group (90.9% vs. 81.81%; p = 0.30). But the rapid group was had a shorter length of stay compared with the standard group (24.62 vs. 29.08 days; p = 0.42) and cheaper (USD 1,700 vs. USD 1,876; p = 0.98). Pain and fever were common complications in both groups. Conclusions: Rapid and standard pleurodesis groups showed the same efficiency and effectivity rates in treating MPE patients. However, the rapid pleurodesis group has a shorter length of stay and cheaper, but there was no statistically difference.

Publisher

A and V Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3