Practical aspects of the organization of ethical review of clinical trials in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Author:

Nezhmetdinova Farida T.ORCID,Guryleva Marina E.ORCID

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly affected all spheres of life, including biomedical research. The ethical regulation of clinical trials has a long history in international and domestic practice. An efficient infrastructure of international and national legislation has been created. At the same time, there are features of the organization of ethical review of clinical trials that arise under the restrictions associated with COVID-19. Healthcare of all countries is faced with the need to develop new approaches caused by the speed of the spread of the disease, its severe consequences for the life and health of people, the excessive burden on the medical worker, not only physical, but also psychological, including those associated with ethical problems. The purpose of this research was to study and analyze the experience of ethical review of clinical trials in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic, its regulatory framework in international and domestic practice. For high-quality and lawful conduct of clinical trials in Russia in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic, appropriate conditions were created, namely, a vertical base: the central ethical committee of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation local ethical committees based in clinical institutions and research centers. They are provided with sufficient and high-quality legal support in the form of laws of the Russian Federation, country standards and by-laws. The work of local ethics committees is built in accordance with strict ethical international and domestic standards. Standard operating procedures implemented in local ethics committees provide for all the nuances of situations, including those implemented using modern telecommunication technologies and other end-to-end information technologies. Even if many restrictions are imposed, biomedical research must continue, and accordingly, it must be carried out under the strict control and monitoring of research ethics committees. The article presents an overview of legal sources, an analysis of the main approaches in domestic and foreign literature, taking into account historical retrospective.

Publisher

ECO-Vector LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Nuremberg Code (1947). Human rights and freedoms in psychiatry. http://www.consultant.ru/law/podborki/nyurnbergskij_kodeks/ (access date: 15.02.2022). (In Russ.)

2. Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association “Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects”. http://www.bioethics.ru/ (access date: 15.02.2022). (In Russ.)

3. ICH GCP — ICH harmonised guideline integra¬ted addendum to ICH E6(R1). Guideline for Good Clinical Practice ICH E6(R2) ICH Consensus Guideline — ICH GCP. https://www.ema.europa.eu/ (access date: 15.02.2022).

4. Model law on the protection of human rights and dignity in biomedical research. Inter-Parliamentary Assembly of the Confederation of Independent States (Eastern Europe & Central Asia); 2004. http://biomed.nas.gov.ua/files/model_law_eng.pdf (access date: 10.02.2022).

5. Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. UNESCO; 2005. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/bioethics_and_hr.shtml (access date: 15.02.2022).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3