Abstract
Background. The appearing of data on cam-type FAI in patients with sequelae of slipped capital femoral epiphysis characterized by mild chronic epiphyseal displacement suggests that along with fixation of the proximal femoral epiphysis, modeling of the head-neck transition and restoration of the femoral offsets using arthroscopic techniques should be performed. Meanwhile, it is well known that after epiphyseal fixation, complete remodeling of the epimetaphysis and, consequently, disappearance of the morphological substrate of potential FAI can occur due to the ongoing enchondral and echondral growth. In this regard, the issue of indications for intraarticular interventions in studied patients remains currently open. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of FAI in the postoperative period in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis characterized by mild chronic epiphyseal displacement, and to estimate the requirement of further surgical treatment. Methods. The results of the examination of 32 patients with mild chronic epiphyseal displacement in the typical posterior inferior direction who underwent cannulated epiphyseal screw fixation were analyzed for the severity of epimetaphysis remodeling and the presence of FAI in the postoperative period. Clinical, radiological, magnetic resonance, and statistical methods were used. Results. At the age of 18-19 years, FAI with pain syndrome in everyday life was found in 9 (28.1%) patients 8 of them did not have even partial remodeling of the femoral component of the joint, another 9 (28.1%) patients did not suffer from pain syndrome in everyday life, but had other clinical, radiological and MR signs of cam-type FAI. Complete or almost complete remodeling of the proximal femoral epimetaphysis occurred in 14 (43.8%) patients. Conclusion. In our opinion, therapeutic and diagnostic arthroscopy of the hip joint for the purpose of modeling the head-neck transition at the age of 18-19 years is indicated for more than one quarter (28.1%) of the investigated patients because of the presence of reliable signs of FAI.
Reference34 articles.
1. Krasnov A.I. [Slipped capital femoral epiphysis]. In: Traumatology: National Guide. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2011. P. 989-994. (In Russian).
2. Long-term outcome of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a 38-year follow-up of 66 patients
3. Shkatula Ju.V. [Etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (the analytical review of the literature)]. Vestnik Sum GU. 2007;2:122-135. (In Russian).
4. Krechmar A.N., Krasnov A.I. [Surgical treatment of cervical-epiphyseal deformities of the femur in children and adolescents]. Ortopediya, travmatologiya i protezirovanie [Orthopedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics]. 1986;(3):18-20. (In Russian).
5. The Delay in Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Review of 102 Patients