Modern methods of regional and postoperative anesthesia during cesarean section: a literature review

Author:

Korobka Miriam N.1ORCID,Pichugina Valeria M.2ORCID,Khazieva Anzhelika R.2ORCID,Borisov Alexandr V.2ORCID,Stepanova Anastasiya V.3ORCID,Safina Diana A.2ORCID,Strelnikova Polina A.2ORCID,Udagova Aishat A.4ORCID,Tarasenko Elena A.4ORCID,Grezin Aleksey G.4ORCID,Mukhamadiyarova Karina R.2ORCID,Filippov Artem A.2ORCID,Krestyaninova Victoria V.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Rostov State Medical University

2. Bashkir State Medical University

3. Georgievsky Order of the Red Banner of Labor Medical Institute

4. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Abstract

The number of cesarean section (CS) deliveries increases annually in Russia. General anesthesia involves certain risks, including difficult or unsuccessful intubation, aspiration, and infectious and thromboembolic complications. Therefore, regional anesthesia is the method of choice for CS. To date, choosing the most effective method of regional anesthesia remains challenging, including in the postoperative period. Thus, this review aimed to compare the effectiveness of regional anesthesia methods used in CS and identify the most preferred ones for use in clinical practice. The authors conducted a literature search in the electronic databases PubMed (MEDLINE), eLibrary, and Google Scholar using the following keywords and their combinations in English and in Russian: «cesarean section», «neural morphine», «regional analgesia», «epidural analgesia», «peripheral nerve block», nerve block», «paravertebral block», «cesarean section», neuroaxial use of opioids», «regional analgesia», «epidural analgesia», «peripheral nerve blockade», «blockade», and «paravertebral blockade». The search results revealed 3 558 in the PubMed database, 94 in eLibrary, and 2 662 in Google Scholar. The results show that the neuroaxial administration of opioids remains the gold standard of pain relief after CS; however, information on the analgesic effectiveness of new blockades, such as anterior block of the quadratic lumbar muscle and block of the muscle straightening the spine, continues to accumulate.

Publisher

ECO-Vector LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3