Dialectical and activity-based foundations for the modern original definition of science

Author:

Sorokin Roman V.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the actual problem of uncertainty in science. The work done not only contributes to the removal/solution of this modern problem, but also contributes to the theoretical understanding of the need for qualitative changes in the sphere of scientific activity, the most organic combination of theory with practice to form a new form of science, guaranteed to remove the global dangers and uncertainties of scientific and technological development. The author presents the basis for the formation of a modern, general definition of science, the absence of which indicates the presence of the above problem. The aim of the research is to give a modern general definition of science, making a serious step, if not to the final solution, then to a generally meaningful solution of this problem. In the authors opinion, all substantive elements necessary for forming a modern general definition of science have already been identified, but they are not structured. The methodological approach has a high importance in solving this problem, and the emphasis should be placed on dialectics, rather than formal logic. In dialectical methodology, it is necessary to refer to the theory of dialectical development from the abstract to the concrete, as well as the general theory of activity. The specificity of science is defined in the consistent disclosure of the content of science as knowledge, as individual-collective, internalist-externalist activity and as a sphere of social life. As a result of the analysis of these aspects the author comes to the initial, general and actual definition of science.

Publisher

ECO-Vector LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. Agudov VV. Voshozhdenie ot abstraktnogo k konkretnomu. In: Dialektika nauchnogo poznanija. Ocherk dialekticheskoj logiki. Moscow: Nauka; 1978. P. 172–198. (In Russ.)

2. Alekseev IS. Nauka. In: Filosofskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar’. Moscow: Sovetskaja jenciklopedija; 1989. (In Russ.)

3. Arshinov VI, Budanov VG. Paradigm of complexity and socio-humanitarian projections of convergent technologies. Voprosy filosofii. 2016;(1):59–70. (In Russ.)

4. Bernal J. Nauka v istorii obshchestva : per. s angl. Ed. by B.M. Kedrova, I.V. Kuznecova. Moscow; 1956. (In Russ.)

5. Verkhoturov AD, Makienko VM, Voronov BA, Konevtsov LA. On a new definition of science with regard to the need of resolving mankind’’s global problems, including environment. Scientific Notes of Komsomolsk-on-Amour State Technical University. 2013;1(3(15)):86–93. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3