Author:
Akhpashev Alexander,Brizhan Leonid,Artemiev Aleksander,Bolotnikov Mikhail,Shipulin Aleksander,Kashoob Ali
Abstract
Background: The development of contractures after total knee replacement is most often associated with arthrofibrosis and makes up 1.3% - 5.7% of the total number of cases of joint replacement. Conservative treatment is ineffective. Arthrolysis is pathogenetically substantiated (arthroscopic or open).
Aims: assessment of the effectiveness of arthrolysis as a method of treating knee joint contractures after arthroplasty, comparison of the results of arthroscopic and open arthrolysis, analysis of complications.
Materials and methods: Compare two groups. In group 1, 57 patients underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis. In group 2, 54 patients underwent open arthrolysis. The operations were performed from 2015 to 2019, the observation period ranged from one year to three years. As criteria for the result of treatment, KSS data were used (general and functional assessment of the knee joint), as well as separately the amplitude of movements in the joint before surgery and at different times after it.
Results: One of the results of this work was the optimization of arthroscopic arthrolysis technique. Improved surgical access and joint revision sequence. According to the KSS scale and range of motion, the best results were obtained in group 1. Especially important is the lesser number of complications in comparison with the 2nd group requiring repeated interventions, including revision arthroplasty. In the 1st group of such cases there were 3 (5.3%), in the 2nd group - 7 (13.0%).
Conclusions: Arthroscopic arthrolysis is a less traumatic and more effective treatment for arthritis of the knee. It seems appropriate to gradually displace open arthrolysis by arthroscopic.