Comparative assessment of acceptability of the prognostic scales in predicting the risk of interhospital evacuation of newborns

Author:

Mukhametshin Rustam F.ORCID,Davidova Nadezhda S.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety of interhospital transfer of newborns remains one of the most important issues of emergency neonatology. Assessment of risks associated with transfer is the basic concern of pre-transport preparation. AIM: This study aimed to assess and compare the predictive value of the KSCHONN, National Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (NTISS), and TRIPS scales in predicting the risks associated with the interhospital transfer of newborns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort study included data from 604 visits of the transport team. The KSHONN, NTISS, and TRIPS scales were used in the assessments, the therapeutic actions of the transport team during transfer were evaluated, and mortality during the first day after assessments was analyzed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) was calculated for the KSCHONN, NTISS, and TRIPS scales in relation to the therapeutic actions of the transport team and first-day mortality. RESULTS: The predictive values of the KSHONN and TRIPS scales for additional infusion reflected AUC ROC values of 0.877 (0.4361.317) and AUC ROC 0.889 (0.4681.311), respectively. The AUC ROC value for predicting catecholamine dose adjustment or appointment and correction of ventilation for all three scales was less than 0.8. The predictive value of all three scales in the prediction of death on the day after the assessment of the transport team is high, and the TRIPS scale had the highest AUC ROC [0.988 (0.9770.999)], which was significantly higher than that for the NTISS scale 0.875 (0.7900.959) (p = 0.004). The KSHONN scale demonstrated a better predictive value for daily mortality [0.984 (0.8611.003)] in comparison with NTISS (p = 0.001). The risk ratio of the daily mortality in the group of patients with an assessment of 94 points according to KSHONN in comparison with patients with an assessment of 68 points was 17.73 (0.88355.8). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated scales predict patient death within a day after the assessment of the transport team with good accuracy, and the KSHONN and TRIPS scales predict the need for additional infusion during transfer. However, none of the scales predict other actions of the team associated with the deterioration of the patients condition during transfer with the required accuracy.

Publisher

ECO-Vector LLC

Reference24 articles.

1. Evaluating and improving neonatal transport services

2. Impact of Land-Based Neonatal Transport on Outcomes in Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn

3. Association of early postnatal transfer and birth outside a tertiary hospital with mortality and severe brain injury in extremely preterm infants: observational cohort study with propensity score matching

4. Vanevskii VL, Ivaneev MD. Mezhgospital’naya transportirovka detei, nakhodyashchikhsya v kriticheskom sostoyanii, v usloviyakh Leningradskoi oblasti. Russian Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology. 1989;(6):60–62. (In Russ.)

5. Shmakov AN, Kokhno VN. Kriticheskie sostoyaniya novorozhdennykh (tekhnologiya distantsionnogo konsul’tirovaniya i ehvakuatsii). Novosibirsk: IPK BIONT, 2007. 168 P. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3