Abstract
BACKGROUND: The safety of interhospital transfer of newborns remains one of the most important issues of emergency neonatology. Assessment of risks associated with transfer is the basic concern of pre-transport preparation.
AIM: This study aimed to assess and compare the predictive value of the KSCHONN, National Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (NTISS), and TRIPS scales in predicting the risks associated with the interhospital transfer of newborns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort study included data from 604 visits of the transport team. The KSHONN, NTISS, and TRIPS scales were used in the assessments, the therapeutic actions of the transport team during transfer were evaluated, and mortality during the first day after assessments was analyzed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) was calculated for the KSCHONN, NTISS, and TRIPS scales in relation to the therapeutic actions of the transport team and first-day mortality.
RESULTS: The predictive values of the KSHONN and TRIPS scales for additional infusion reflected AUC ROC values of 0.877 (0.4361.317) and AUC ROC 0.889 (0.4681.311), respectively. The AUC ROC value for predicting catecholamine dose adjustment or appointment and correction of ventilation for all three scales was less than 0.8. The predictive value of all three scales in the prediction of death on the day after the assessment of the transport team is high, and the TRIPS scale had the highest AUC ROC [0.988 (0.9770.999)], which was significantly higher than that for the NTISS scale 0.875 (0.7900.959) (p = 0.004). The KSHONN scale demonstrated a better predictive value for daily mortality [0.984 (0.8611.003)] in comparison with NTISS (p = 0.001). The risk ratio of the daily mortality in the group of patients with an assessment of 94 points according to KSHONN in comparison with patients with an assessment of 68 points was 17.73 (0.88355.8).
CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated scales predict patient death within a day after the assessment of the transport team with good accuracy, and the KSHONN and TRIPS scales predict the need for additional infusion during transfer. However, none of the scales predict other actions of the team associated with the deterioration of the patients condition during transfer with the required accuracy.
Reference24 articles.
1. Evaluating and improving neonatal transport services
2. Impact of Land-Based Neonatal Transport on Outcomes in Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn
3. Association of early postnatal transfer and birth outside a tertiary hospital with mortality and severe brain injury in extremely preterm infants: observational cohort study with propensity score matching
4. Vanevskii VL, Ivaneev MD. Mezhgospital’naya transportirovka detei, nakhodyashchikhsya v kriticheskom sostoyanii, v usloviyakh Leningradskoi oblasti. Russian Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology. 1989;(6):60–62. (In Russ.)
5. Shmakov AN, Kokhno VN. Kriticheskie sostoyaniya novorozhdennykh (tekhnologiya distantsionnogo konsul’tirovaniya i ehvakuatsii). Novosibirsk: IPK BIONT, 2007. 168 P. (In Russ.)