Analysis of type and frequency dynamics of rehabilitation assistive devices in children with cerebral palsy

Abstract

Background. Currently, cerebral palsy is the most common neuromuscular disease in the pediatric population. Spastic forms of cerebral palsy are characterized by secondary musculoskeletal complications. They are corrected by the use of assistive devices and, especially, orthoses, along with surgical treatment, botulinum toxin, and others. Aim. The aim of this study was to assess the type and frequency dynamics of rehabilitation assistive devices in children with spastic forms of cerebral palsy, depending on the level of the gross motor function of the patient. Materials and methods. A prospective analysis was conducted by questioning 214 parents of children with spastic forms of cerebral palsy who were treated for the period from 2017 to 2019. The patients were divided into five groups according to the gross motor function classification (GMFCS). The statistical processing was performed using the application package Statistica 10 and Microsoft Excel. Results. Statistically significant differences in variances (p 0.05) were obtained between the number of rehabilitation assistive devices used in the anamnesis in the year before the questionnaire (period I) and assistive devices used in the last six months before the questionnaire (period II). Repeatedly, patients used orthopedic shoes the most often, and the trunk-hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses the most rarely. We found five main causes groups of assistive device use failure for children with cerebral palsy. Conclusion. Statistically significant differences in variances were obtained between the frequency of rehabilitation assistive devices used in the anamnesis and during the last six months before the questionnaire was obtained. It has been confirmed that patients used orthopedic shoes most regularly; of all functional orthoses, hip adductor orthosis was used most often repeatedly, whereas the trunk-hip-knee-foot orthoses were the least common. Factors such as a negative attitude of the child towards the orthosis, uncomfortable in life, the presence of construction errors of the product, the absence of appropriate appointments in the individual rehabilitation and habilitation programs for the patient, have led to the most frequent rejection of the reuse of the technical device for rehabilitation. At the same time, positive or negative dynamics on the condition of the patient affected the regularity of the use of a technical device for rehabilitation in only one in six patients.