Sensitivity of pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms to probiotic strains in the light of personalized probiotic therapy

Author:

Parakhina Anastasia I.ORCID,Parakhina Larisa I.ORCID,Troshina Darya A.ORCID,Levina Katerina E.ORCID,Pimenova Yulia A.ORCID,Koteneva Elena N.ORCID,Evstropov Aleksandr N.ORCID,Zakharova Liudmila N.ORCID,Mironov Andrey Yu.ORCID,Suranova Tatyana G.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resistance of microorganisms to antimicrobial drugs (AMP) is one of the global problems of modern medicine, which poses a serious threat to human health. The formation of the resistance of pathogens to AMP forces us to look for new ways to combat them. Probiotic therapy is one of the promising and safe methods of treating many infectious diseases. AIM: This study assesses the sensitivity of clinical strains of pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria and fungi to microorganisms that are part of probiotic preparations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sensitivity of 93 cultures of pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms (UPM) isolated from the feces of patients with intestinal dysbiosis to strains of probiotic bacteria isolated from commercial probiotic preparations was studied: Lactobacillus plantarum 8RA-3, Escherichia coli M-17, Bacillus subtilis strain VKPM B-10641, Enterococcus faecium SF-68, Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 by the delayed antagonism method. RESULTS: Pathogenic microorganisms showed low and moderate sensitivity to the probiotic strain of L. plantarum. Sensitivity to the probiotic strain of B. subtilis was detected in Staphylococcus aureus strains, low or completely absent in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., Serratia marcescens. The most sensitive to the probiotic strain were clinical strains of E. coli. CONCLUSION: UPM and pathogenic microorganisms isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of patients with dysbiosis have different sensitivity to probiotic strains: from high to several probiotics to its complete absence. The empirical approach to prescribing a probiotic does not guarantee a therapeutic effect, which makes it prudent to individualize the selection of a probiotic based on an assessment of its antimicrobial activity against isolated pathogens.

Publisher

ECO-Vector LLC

Subject

Building and Construction

Reference24 articles.

1. Danilov AI, Zharkova LP. Antibiotic resistance: arguments and facts. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy. 2017;26(5):6–9. (In Russ).

2. Vorobiev AA, Bykov AS, Boichenko MN, et al. Medical microbiology, virology and immunology. 3rd ed. Moscow: Meditsinskoye informatsionnoye agentstvo; 2022. 704 p. (In Russ).

3. Satybaeva RT. Indications for use and evidence-based basis for the choice of probiotics in the practice of a pediatrician. Medicine (Almaty). 2018;(1):28–34. (In Russ).

4. Antibiotic resistance in the environment: a critical insight on its occurrence, fate, and eco-toxicity

5. PERSONALIZED MEDICINE: FROM IDEA TO IMPLEMENTATION IN PRACTICAL HEALTH CARE

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3