Bayesian meta-analysis of the binary outcomes of randomized clinical trials

Author:

Sapozhnikov Kirill V.1ORCID,Parfenov Sergei A.1ORCID,Lazarev Andrei A.2ORCID,Kirichek Ruslan V.2ORCID,Tolkacheva Daria G.3ORCID,Mironenko Olga N.3ORCID,Klishkova Natalia V.1ORCID,Kulishenko Valeriy V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kirov Military Medical Academy

2. Saint Petersburg State University of Telecommunications

3. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Abstract

The study presented the main aspects of conducting Bayesian network meta-analysis as a method of indirect comparisons using mathematical models. To describe the performance of the Bayesian network meta-analysis, codes for the random-effects and fixed-effects models were included. The models were written in Component Pascal and run in the JAGS program. To allow cross-reference of results, data used for modeling purposes were generated data from the article by D. Hu, A.M. O'Connor, S. Wang et al. [6]. The R language and rjags package were used to load data into the model and run the program. To determine the best model, model adequacy indicators were used, such as total residual deviation, and leverage and deviation information criterion were calculated using the original R code. A graphical method was also used to determine the adequacy of the models using the ggplot2 package. An example of constructing a network of evidence based on available results on the effectiveness of drugs from clinical trials was considered, taking into account the assumptions of transitivity and heterogeneity. Indirect and direct comparisons to determine the true estimates of drugs were possible. The elements of Bayesian statistics, such as prior and posterior probabilities and likelihood, and the advantages of using them in meta-analysis were explained. The mathematical apparatus of the generalized linear model was presented in both general and specific forms, using binomial output data to obtain relative estimates of the effects of therapies. An explanation of how the models work is presented. The random-effects model showed superiority over the fixed-effects model in the comparison of adequacy metrics. To achieve better adequacy, data must be carefully downloaded from publications, and informative priors selected. In general, Bayesian synthesis is a distinct and important type of network meta-analysis. It is unique because it uses a probabilistic approach to data analysis. Understanding the basic principles of Bayesian statistics is also an important aspect of the successful use of this method in various research fields. However, for effective application of this method, attention must be paid to careful data preparation and the choice of priors. With informative prior distributions and proper implementation, Bayesian synthesis can produce more accurate and reliable results than other meta-analysis methods. Bayesian synthesis is a method of statistical data analysis recognized worldwide and in the Russian Federation..

Publisher

ECO-Vector LLC

Reference15 articles.

1. Network meta-analysis for clinicians

2. Omelianovskii VV, Avksenteva MV, Sura MV, et al. Methodological recommendations for conducting meta-analyses. Moscow: Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care; 2017. 28 р. (In Russ.)

3. Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis

4. Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed

5. Undertaking network meta‐analyses

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3