Identifying fake conclusions of forensic medical examinations using an artificial intelligence technology based on the experience in the Republic of Kazakhstan: a Review

Author:

Voyevodkin Denis V.ORCID,Rustemova Gauhar R.ORCID,Begaliyev Yernar N.ORCID,Igembayev Kussain A.ORCID,Ayupova Zauresh N.ORCID

Abstract

This review discusses the legal aspects on the use of mathematical statistics and machine learning (hereinafter referred to as artificial intelligence) in forensic activities to identify both expert errors and fake expert opinions. An attempt has been made to establish the criteria for evaluating conclusions of forensic examinations by determining their relevance, admissibility, reliability, and objectivity, as well as the objective possibility of distinguishing expert errors from deliberately false and fake expert opinions. A SWOT analysis on the use of artificial intelligence was carried out to solve the issue of its application in the field under consideration, which revealed its advantages, and disadvantages. The use of mathematical statistics and machine learning methods is not a universal method to identify fakes in expert opinions. However, given that this method can give both false-positive and false-negative results, its outcomes should be verified by independent experts. In addition, to effectively prevent the facts of falsification, comprehensive measures should be taken, including not only the detection of manipulations but also the prevention of the possibility of their occurrence, as well as the punishment of the perpetrators. Thus, this review proposed several amendments and additions to the current legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Publisher

ECO-Vector LLC

Subject

Law,Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Anatomy

Reference24 articles.

1. Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated July 7, 2020 No. 360-VI of the ZRK «On health and the healthcare system» [Electronic resource]. (In Russ). Available from: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K2000000360. Accessed: 01.04.2023.

2. The Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated February 10, 2017 No. 44-VI SAM “On forensic expert activity” [Electronic resource]. (In Russ). Available from: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z1700000044. Accessed: 01.04.2023.

3. Tarasov AA. New in legal forms of using special knowledge in proving criminal cases. Legal Policy Legal Life. 2004;(4):79–87. (In Russ).

4. Belkin RS. Criminalistics: Problems of today. Topical issues of Russian criminology. Moscow: Norma; 2001. 240 р. (In Russ).

5. Averyanova TV. Forensic examination: A course of general theory. Moscow: Norma; 2006. 480 р. (In Russ).

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3