Pain after cesarean section: do we have reliable predictors? Scoping review

Author:

Shindyapina Nataliya V.1ORCID,Marshalov Dmitry V.1ORCID,Shifman Efim M.23ORCID,Kuligin Alexander V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University

2. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

3. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Every year, the number of publications devoted to the study of various tools for predicting the intensity of pain after cesarean section is growing, which necessitated the generalization and systematization of these data. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to identify factors contributing to high-intensity pain after cesarean section (CS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: a scoping review based on the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar. The search was performed using the following keywords: “predictors” OR “prediction” OR “forecasting” AND “cesarean section” AND “pain”) in Russian and English, last search date November 30, 2022. The inclusion criteria for the review were formulated using the PICOD method: (P) population: postpartum women; (I) intervention: CS surgery; (C) comparison: surgical approach, anesthesia method, psychological status, pain threshold, genetic characteristics; (O) outcomes: pain intensity scores, analgesic requirements; (D) study design: prospective/retrospective cohort studies. Exclusion criteria were as follows: lack of sufficient data or outcome of interest; duplicate publication; chronic pain; publications devoted to pain relief during childbirth or pain after other surgical interventions; lack of full-text version; reviews and meta-analyses. The quality of selected non-randomized cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: 30 cohort studies were selected, involving 11,063 patients. Most studies were assigned an NOS score of 6 to 8, which was considered good quality. Two groups of factors were identified as predictors of the intensity of postoperative pain: factors associated with the characteristics of the patient (physical status, psychological status, individual pain threshold and pain tolerance, genetic characteristics) and factors associated with the characteristics of the operation and anesthesia. CONCLUSION: the scoping review allowed us to identify reliable factors predicting high-intensity pain after CS, which should be taken into account when planning anesthesiological care for patients.

Publisher

ECO-Vector LLC

Reference54 articles.

1. Stepanova IaV, Shchelkova OY, Lebedinsky KM, et al. Prediction of postoperative pain based on psychological characteristics of patients and standardized pain stimuli. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2013;3:58–62. EDN: QAVZVL

2. Predicting pain after Cesarean delivery: pressure algometry, temporal summation, three-item questionnaire

3. Personalized analgesic management for cesarean delivery

4. Factors Affecting Post Caesarean Pain Intensity among Women in the Northern Peninsular of Malaysia

5. Gorkem U, Togrul C, Sahiner Y, et al. Preoperative anxiety may increase postcesarean delivery pain and analgesic consumption. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82(9):974–980.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3