Affiliation:
1. South Ural State University (National Research University)
2. Perm State National Research University; Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service
Abstract
Objective: elucidating the potential of digital transformation for elaborating the optimal means and methods of collecting evidences and introducing scientific organization of labor of the officials implementing criminal procedure. The scientific approach within the concept consists in minimizing the costs of collecting evidentiary information in criminal cases in electronic form and by electronic means, as well as storing the criminal case materials in electronic form.Methods: dialectic method occupies the leading position among the research methods, the issues of electronic documentation being considered in the interaction and interdependence with information-technological development of the society. The set of scientific cognition methods within the research creates prerequisites for objective and comprehensive approach to the problems under study.Results: the authors’ concept of electronic evidence is a system of information-technological and legal views on the criminal-procedural form, which is intended for optimizing the process of collecting, registering and preserving them in the criminal case materials. The concept development is aimed at elaborating new approaches to organizing the work of investigation agencies and courts, taking into account the achievements in the sphere of information technologies, providing new techniques of collecting criminal-relevant, criminal-procedural, criminological significant information when investigating and hearing of a criminal case. The proposed concept is also aimed at improving interaction and in-service communication of the officials of the preliminary investigation bodies with the officials of information-technological systems for the purposes of collecting evidentiary information in electronic form.Scientific novelty: the changes were systemically analyzed, which are taking place in the contemporary information society, through the prism of the emerging problems between the sectoral criminal-procedural evidentiary law and more modern technological means of collecting evidentiary information. The article demonstrates a new approach to creating technological interaction using digital technologies, on the scientific base of organization of proving activity, intended to optimize and rationalize the process of proving in criminal procedure.Practical significance: the research materials can be used to prepare proposals on making changes and additions in the current legislation with a view of implementing the practice of already functioning models of criminal-procedural activity of foreign countries, an inexhaustible potential of information-technologies, software, and artificial intelligence to rationalize proving in criminal cases.
Publisher
Kazan Innovative University named after V. G. Timiryasov
Reference24 articles.
1. Chen, S., Zhao, C., Huang, L., Yuan, J., & Liu, M. (2020). Study and implementation on the application of block-chain in electronic evidence generation. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 35, 301001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.301001
2. de Hert, P., Parlar, C., & Sajfert, J. (2018). The Cybercrime Convention Committee’s 2017 Guidance Note on Production Orders: Unilateralist transborder access to electronic evidence promoted via soft law. Computer Law & Amp; Security Review, 34(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.003
3. Golovko, L. V. (2019). The digitalization in criminal procedure: local optimization or global revolution? Vestnik ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti, 1, 15–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2414-3995-2019-10002
4. Golubtsov, V. G. (2019). Theory of evidence and digitization in civil proceedings. Perm Legal Almanac, 1, 379–387. (In Russ.).
5. Guo, Z. (2023). Regulating the use of electronic evidence in Chinese courts: Legislative efforts, academic debates and practical applications. Computer Law & Amp; Security Review, 48, 105774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105774