Mediation in criminal misdemeanor cases

Author:

Charkoudian L.1,Walter J.2,Harmon-Darrow C.3,Bernstein J.2

Affiliation:

1. Community Mediation Maryland

2. Maryland Judiciary

3. University of Maryland

Abstract

Objective: to fill a research gap by examining the shortand long-term impact of community mediation in criminal misdemeanor cases within the context of potentially ongoing relationships.Methods: dialectical approach to cognition of social phenomena, using the general scientific and specific scientific methods of cognition, based on it, including telephone polling and studying cases data.Results: Diversion of criminal misdemeanors to mediation by district attorneys has been practiced since the 1970s, but research on its impact on critical outcomes like recidivism is scant and outdated. This quasi-experimental study compares 78 mediated cases from a county that diverts cases to mediation with 128 cases in a similar neighboring county that does not, using phone surveys and case review to ask whether recidivism in mediated cases differs from cases prosecuted or treated as usual over the subsequent year. Controlling for case factors and attitudes toward conflict, a case that is not mediated was five times more likely to result in judicial action, five times more likely to result in jury trial demand, and ten times more likely to result in supervised probation or jail time, and mediated cases were almost five times less likely to return to criminal court in the subsequent year than those that were not mediated.Scientific novelty: Preliminary analysis of case characteristics revealed that cases in the mediation and comparison group had the following characteristics: defendants had no prior felony convictions, did not have multiple misdemeanor charges, and had no outstanding warrants. Charges involving any type of weapon, drugs, or violence more serious than second degree assault had been excluded from the comparison group since they are usually excluded from diversion to mediation.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific, pedagogical and law enforcement activities when considering the issues related to mediation in criminal misdemeanor cases.The article was first published in English language by Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society and The Western Society of Criminology Hosting by Scholastica. For more information please contact: CCJLS@WesternCriminology.org.For original publication: Charkoudian, L., Walter, J., Harmon-Darrow, C., Bernstein, J. (2021). Mediation in Criminal MisdemeanorCases. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 22 (3), 14–29.Publication URL: https://ccjls.scholasticahq.com/article/30144-mediation-in-criminal-misdemeanor-cases 

Publisher

Tatar Educational Centre Taglimat, Ltd.

Reference89 articles.

1. LaFountain, R. C., Schauffler, R. Y., Strickland, S. M., Raftery, W., Bromage, C., Lee, C., Gibson, S. (2008). Examining the work of state courts, 2007: A national perspective from the Court Statistics Project. Court Statistics Project. https://www.courtstatistics.org/data/assets/pdf_file/0020/40853/Examining-the-Work-of-State-Courts-2007,-A-National-Perspective-fromthe-Court-Statistics-Project.pdf

2. Roberts, J. (2011). Why misdemeanors matter: Defining effective advocacy in the lower criminal courts. UC Davis Law Review, 45, 277–372. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/289/

3. Prudente, T. (2021, March 26). Marilyn Mosby declares war on drugs over, formalizes policy to dismiss all possession charges in Baltimore. The Baltimore Sun. https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/crime/bs-md-ci-cr-mosby-stops-drug-prosecutions20210326-7ra6pn2a4zcexnj6hmfv4wj6listory.html

4. Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2018). Misdemeanorland: Criminal courts and social control in an age of broken windows policing. Princeton University Press.

5. Natapoff, A. (2018). Punishment without crime: How our massive misdemeanor system traps the innocent and makes America more unequal. Basic Books.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3