Affiliation:
1. Institute for the Development of Education of the Republic of Bashkortostan;
Bashkir State University
Abstract
Objective: to develop the conceptual provisions and conceptual-categorical apparatus of a human-oriented economy by developing approaches to the definition of a human-oriented economy and determining the universal and specifi characteristics of the phenomenon under study.Methods: content analysis, the method of formal logic, the method of two-level triadic decryption of categories.Results: the discrepancy was revealed between the existing theoretical approaches to human-oriented economy and the socioeconomic relations resulting from the increasing role of human needs associated with human development; the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the human-oriented economy was constructed through the synthesis of two methods: formal logic and two-level triadic decoding of the category; the understanding of the necessary (satisfaction of human needs) and sufficient (objective necessity of human needs) conditions for the development of a human-oriented economy was revealed; two levels of triads of concepts characterizing the essence of a human-centered economy are defined: human nature (biological, cognitive, social), resources (human, material, informational), goods (products, services, ideas).Scientific novelty: the article constructs the new definition of a “human-oriented economy”, which unlike those available in the literature allows complete interpretation of this concept, covering its fundamental qualitative characteristics.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be widely used in scientific activity in order to develop the conceptual apparatus of a human-oriented economy, as well as to form a holistic scientifically subtantiated theory of human-oriented economy. The results obtained are the starting point for the formation of approaches designed to determine the level of development of the human-centered economy in Russia in order to develop a set of measures for its effective management.
Publisher
Tatar Educational Centre Taglimat, Ltd.
Reference48 articles.
1. Bersenev, V. L., Bochko, V. S., Vlasov, M. V., Sukhikh, V. V. (2021). The Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Past and Present Research. Russian Journal of Economic Theory, 18 (1), 1–28 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-1.1
2. Nasyrova, S. I. (2021). Critical understanding of a human-centered economy as a social-oriented economic system. Economics and Management: Theory, Methodology, Practice: proceedings of the XVI International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 140–144). Ufa (In Russ.).
3. Alonzo Smith, G., Hickerson, S. (1985). Human economy: economics as if people mattered. Studies in Economics and Finance, 9 (2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028660
4. Hilkka, Pietilä. (1997). The triangle of the human economy: household – cultivation – industrial production an attempt at making visible the human economy in toto. Ecological Economics, 20 (2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(96)00023-7
5. Röpke, W. (1999). A Humane Economy: The Social Framework of the Free Market. 3rd edition. Isi Books.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献