Abstract
Using unique nationwide property-level mortgage, flood risk, and flood map data, we analyze whether lenders respond to flood risk that is not captured in FEMA flood maps. We find that lenders are less willing to originate mortgages and charge higher rates for lower LTV loans that face “un-mapped” flood risk. This effect is weaker for high income applicants, as well as non-banks and small local banks. However, we find evidence that non-banks and local banks are more likely to securitize/sell mortgages to borrowers prone to flood risk. Taken together, our results are indicative that mortgage lenders are aware of flood risk outside FEMA’s identified flood zones.
Publisher
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Reference33 articles.
1. 1. Blickle, K. and J. Santos (2021). The unintended consequences of "mandatory" flood insurance. NYFed Working Paper series.
2. The impact of securitization on credit rationing: Empirical evidence;Carbo-Valverde;Journal of Financial Stability 20,2015
3. Risk management, capital structure and lending at banks;Cebenoyan;Journal of Banking & Finance 28,2004
4. 4. Chavaz, M. (2016). Dis-integrating credit markets: Diversification, securitization, and lending in a recovery. Bank of England Working Paper No. 617.
5. Storm surges, informational shocks, and the price of urban real estate: An application to the case of hurricane sandy;Cohen;Regional Science and Urban Economics 90,2021