Comparative analysis of Russian and international requirements for soft dosage forms

Author:

Avtina N.V.1,Prasolova A.V.2,Zhilyakova E.T.3,Glizhova T.N.4

Affiliation:

1. Belgorod State National Research University, st. Pobeda, 85, Belgorod, 308015, Russian Federation;

2. Belgorod State National Research University, st. Pobeda, 85, Belgorod, 308015, Russian Federation; North-Caucasus Federal University, st. Pushkina, 1, Stavropol, 355017, Russian Federation

3. Belgorod State National Research University, st. Pobeda, 85, Belgorod, 308015, Russian Federation

4. North-Caucasus Federal University, st. Pushkina, 1, Stavropol, 355017, Russian Federation

Abstract

Introduction. In the Russian Federation, the latest version of the State Pharmacopoeia, XV edition, has been developed and is actively used. (entered into force on September 1, 2023). However, when developing and introducing various medicines into production, pharmaceutical services are forced to turn to GMP and GLP standards to bring the requirements into compliance with European standards. In this connection, it is relevant to conduct a comparative analysis of the regulatory requirements imposed, in particular, on soft dosage forms, in order to identify their similarities and differences. The established differential features specified in the General Pharmacopoeial Article «Soft Dosage Forms» (GF XV ed., OFS.1.4.1.0008) and foreign pharmacopoeial articles will allow pharmaceutical specialists to harmonize the requirements and use them in the pharmaceutical development and standardization of dosage forms in the form of gels , creams, liniments, ointments, pastes. Objective: comparative analysis of Russian and international pharmacopoeial requirements for soft dosage forms to identify differential features and develop proposals for harmonizing quality indicators in accordance with modern standards. Material and methods. The main materials for carrying out the information and analytical research method were the requirements reflected in domestic and foreign regulatory documentation that controls the quality of soft dosage forms. To solve the problems, we used materials from monographs of six leading pharmacopoeias, including foreign ones – State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation XV ed. (SF RF), State Pharmacopoeia of the Republic of Belarus (SP RB), Pharmacopoeia of the Eurasian Economic Union (Ph. Eur.), British Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Br.), Chinese Pharmacopoeia (Ch. Ph.), Indian Pharmacopoeia (Ind. Ph.) and Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia 2010 (Ayur. Ph.). Results. A comparative study of pharmacopoeial requirements for the characteristics and quality indicators of soft dosage forms presented in the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation XV (2023), State Pharmacopoeia of the Republic of Belarus (2013, 2016), Pharmacopoeia of the Eurasian Economic Union (2020) was carried out, Ph. Br. (2020), Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2020), Indian Pharmacopoeia (2022) and Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia (2010). The analysis showed differences in approaches to standardization and quality control of soft dosage forms in leading pharmacopoeias. The results of the study can be used in the pharmaceutical development and standardization of soft dosage forms, as well as in adjusting the General Pharmacopoeia Monograph “Soft dosage forms”. Differences in pharmacopoeial requirements, reflected in Pharmacopoeial monographs, have been identified in the development and quality control of soft dosage forms. Conclusion. The fundamental differential features of regulatory requirements have been identified, making it possible to formulate changes and additions to the General Pharmacopoeia Monograph «Soft dosage forms» during their pharmaceutical development and standardization.

Publisher

Russian Vrach, Publishing House Ltd.

Reference17 articles.

1. Ниязов Р.Р., Васильев А.Н., Гавришина Е.В., Драницына М.А. Качество лекарственных препаратов: связь нормативной документации со спецификацией, регистрационным досье, фармакопеей и GMP. Ремедиум. 2017; 4. [Niyazov R.R., Vasiliev A.N., Gavrishina E.V., Dranitsyna M.A. Quality of medicinal products: connection of regulatory documentation with specifications, registration dossier, pharmacopoeia and GMP. Remedium. 2017; 4 (in Russian)].

2. De A. et al. Pharmacopoeias, national formulary and extra pharmacopoeia. Dosage Forms, Formulation Developments and Regulations. Academic Press. 2024; 83–98.

3. Shishova L.I., Sakanyan E.I., Shemeryankina T.B. et al. Pharmacopoeial Quality Requirements for Compounded Pharmaceuticals: Present and Future. Pharm Chem J. 2017; 51: 731–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-017-1683-3

4. Колесникова С.С., Василенко М.А. Государственное управление и государственное регулирование в здравоохранении. Компетентность. 2024; 1. [Kolesnikova S.S., Vasilenko M.A. Public administration and state regulation in healthcare. Competence. 2024; 1 (in Russian)].

5. Ковалева Е.Л., Золотов Ю.А., Сомов Д.В. Обеспечение качества лекарственных средств: основные научные подходы и методы контроля. Ведомости Научного центра экспертизы средств медицинского применения. Регуляторные исследования и экспертиза лекарственных средств. 2023; 13 (3): 368–75. [Kovaleva E.L., Zolotov Yu.A., Somov D.V. Ensuring the quality of medicines: basic scientific approaches and control methods. Gazette of the Scientific Center for Expertise of Medical Products. Regulatory research and examination of medicines. 2023; 13 (3): 368–75. DOI: 10.30895/1991-2919-2023-13-3-368-375 (in Russian)].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3