Legal provision for the use of big data in medicine

Author:

Sevostianov A.A.1,Paltsev M.A.2

Affiliation:

1. National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, st. Myasnitskaya, 20, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

2. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov”, Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119234, Russian Federation; Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Russian Peoples’ Friendship University named after Patrice Lumumba”, st. Miklouho-Maklaya, 6, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

Abstract

The use of big data in medical practice is a promising direction in the development of digital personalised medicine. Legal regulation of the use of big data in medical practice is a relevant issue. Legal regulation of the use of big data is based on the need to ensure the confidentiality of medical data related to consequentialist (risks of negative consequences of dissemination of confidential information) and deontological (protection of confidential information as an independent value) concerns. The purpose of our review is to summarise the issues arising from the point of view of legal regulation of the use of big data in medical practice and approaches to legal provision of the use of big data in medicine. Material and methods. The analysis of the main foreign and domestic sources was carried out according to the RINC, Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed databases for the past 10 years. Results. The main foreign models of legal regulation of big data use in medical practice have been analysed. The American model of legal regulation, stipulated in the HIPAA Privacy Rules (The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule), is mainly focused on prevention of negative consequences of confidential medical data dissemination, due to which it is more open to innovation, but still contains some gaps in regulation. The European model of legal regulation, stipulated in the General European Regulation on the Protection of Personal Data (GDPR), is based on the protection of medical data as an independent value, which may not always be effective in terms of the use of big data in medical practice. The Russian regulation of big data use in medical practice is more similar to the European regulation and is also currently not sufficiently adapted for the use of big data in regular medical practice. Conclusion. In Russia there is a number of legal initiatives aimed at forming a legal foundation for the use of big data in medical practice.

Publisher

Russian Vrach, Publishing House Ltd.

Reference13 articles.

1. Карнаухов Н.С., Ильюхин Р.Г. Возможности технологий «Big Data» в медицине. Врач и информационные технологии. 2019; 1: 59–63. [Karnauhov N.S., Il’juhin R.G. Vozmozhnosti tehnologij «Big Data» v medicine. Vrach i informacionnye tehnologii. 2019; 1: 59–63 (in Russian)]

2. Yaqoob I., Hashem I.A.T., Gani A., Mokhtar S., Ahmed E., Anuar N.B., Vasilako A.V. Big data: From beginning to future. International Journal of Information Management. 2016; 36 (6): 1231–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.009

3. Цветкова Л.А., Черченко О.В. Технология больших данных в медицине и здравоохранении России и мира. Врач и информационные технологии. 2016; 3: 60–73. [Cvetkova L.A., Cherchenko O.V. Tehnologija bol’shih dannyh v medicine i zdravoohranenii Rossii i mira. Vrach i informacionnye tehnologii. 2016; 3: 60–73 (in Russian)]

4. Пальцев М.А. Медицина будущего. Персонализированная медицина: опыт прошлого, реалии завтрашнего дня. М.: Российская академия наук, 2020; 152. [Paltcev M.A. Medicina budushhego. Personalizirovannaja medicina: opyt proshlogo, realii zavtrashnego dnja. M.: Rossijskaja akademija nauk, 2020; 152 (in Russian)]

5. Price W.N., Cohen I.G. Privacy in the age of medical big data. Nature medicine. 2019; 25 (1): 37–43. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3