Affiliation:
1. MIREA – Russian Technological University
Abstract
In this article, using game-theoretic approaches, the human community is modeled as a dynamic system, and the influence of such ethical norms of behavior as egoism and altruism, morality (on the example of the Kant imperative or the Golden Rule of Morality) on the state of this system is investigated, as well as the question of determining the effectiveness of the community depending on the prevailing worldview of its representatives. Using the example of a game model of social choice between two norms of behavior – one generally accepted, but outdated, and another, new, not yet widespread, but more advanced and progressive – it is shown that communities, among whose representatives a predominantly egoistic worldview prevails, are less likely to innovate and abandon outdated norms of behavior. Conversely, those communities whose representatives share basic ethical principles are more confident and quickly moving to advanced and progressive norms. In conclusion, the paper examines the question of what advantages a society acquires in which purposeful educational and educational activities are conducted, designed to increase the level of morality and morality among its representatives. The results obtained can be used, firstly, as an integral part of the course on the mathematical base of ethics, which could perform the functions of educational work in higher and secondary educational institutions; and, secondly, for the purposes of evaluating the effectiveness of educational work and state planning in this area.
Reference34 articles.
1. O vnesenii izmenenii v Federal’nyi zakon “Ob obrazovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii’ po voprosam vospitaniya obuchayushchikhsya”: Federal’nyi zakon of 31.07.2020, No. 304-FZ (On amendments to the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation ‘on the education of students”: Federal Law of the Russian Federation of 31.07.2020, No. 304-FZ). (in Russ.). Available from URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/45788
2. Smith A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahas & T. Cadell; 1776. 542 p. Reedited: Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1976. 754 р.
3. Smith A. The theory of moral sentiments. Strand: A. Millar; 1759. Reedited: Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1759. 412 p.
4. Braithwaite R.B. Theory of games as a tool for the moral philosopher. An Inaugural Lecture Delivered in Cambridge on 2 December 1954. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1955. 84 p. Available from URL: https://archive.org/details/theoryofgamesast0000brai
5. Harsanyi J.C. Game and decision theoretic models in ethics. In: R.J. Aumann, S. Hart (Eds.). Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications. Elsevier; 1992. V. 1. Ch. 19. P. 669−707.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献