Affiliation:
1. Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
Abstract
Aim. To study perioperative IAP parameters with various methods of hernioplasty in patients with ventral hernias.Materials and research methods. The results of the treatment of 148 patients with ventral hernias were studied. The first group included 58 patients for whom an anterior separation plasty was used for hernioplasty. The second group included 44 patients who underwent posterior separation of the abdominal wall muscles. The third group consisted of 46 patients who underwent onlay (n=28) and sublay (n=18) methods of hernioplasty.Results and discussion. In patients with W3 hernias, when closing the edges of the hernia orifice, there was a significant increase in IAP to a level corresponding to the I degree of intra-abdominal hypertension, which averaged 12.8±1.9 mm Hg (p<0.05). In patients with W4 hernias, the level of intra-abdominal pressure after closing the edges of the hernia orifice was significantly higher than in patients with W3 hernias, and on average they were 14.7±1.7 mm Hg. (p<0.05), which corresponded to the upper limit of the I degree of intra-abdominal pressure.Conclusion. The results of perioperative monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure indicate the tension nature of onlay and sublay hernioplasty methods, and therefore their use in hernias of W3 and W4 sizes is contraindicated. For large and giant hernias, the use of separation methods of hernioplasty is recommended.
Reference10 articles.
1. Gogiya B.Sh. Abdominalnyy kompartment sindrom i intraabdominalnaya gipertenziya [Abdominal compartment syndrome and intraabdominal hypertension]. Vysokotekhnologicheskaya meditsina – Medicine of high technologies, 2018, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 4-13.
2. Mayorov R.V. Sravnitelnaya kharakteristika effektivnosti razlichnykh sposobov gernioplastiki pri posleoperatsionnykh ventralnykh gryzhakh [Comparative Characteristics of the Effectiveness of Various Methods of Hernioplasty for Postoperative Ventral Hernias]. Byulleten meditsinskikh internet-konferentsiy - Bulletin of medical internet conferences, 2016, No. 6 (6), pp. 1326-1328.
3. Rakhmatulloev R.R. Osobennosti protezirovaniya gryzhevogo defekta pri khirurgicheskom lechenii posleoperatsionnykh ventralnykh gryzh [Peculiarities of hernia defect prosthetics in surgical treatment of postoperative ventral hernias]. Vestnik Avitsenny - Avicenna Bulletin, 2020, No. 1 (22), pp. 134-140.
4. Balla A. Minimally invasive component separation technique for large ventral hernia: which is the best choice? A systematic literature review. Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 14-30.
5. Haskins I.N. Onlay with adhesive use compared with sublay mesh placement in ventral hernia repair: Was chevrel right? An americas hernia society quality collaborative analysis. Journal of American College of Surgeons, 2017, No. 5 (224), pp. 962-970.