Affiliation:
1. Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University);
Kempkens x Kohler GmbH consulting
Abstract
As a strategy against the outbreak and the further spreading of Covid-19, countries, states and communities used different approaches. To protect citizens, governments developed coronavirus mitigation measures and due to which, people were confronted with restrictions in their everyday life. As could be observed in many countries, the society mood turned, since many people did not agree with these restrictions and some people even started demonstrating against governmental mitigation measures. In this context, it can be assumed that some people are more prone to believe in rumors and fake news spread on social media than others. Consequently, a critical attitude is being developed against the government and/or Covid-19 mitigation measures. The present study uses the quantitative data collection method to investigate why some people change their behavior in crises situations and why they are more prone to believing rumors and fake news on social media than others. The results showed that the higher people rate themselves as being critical, the less they believe in rumors and fake news on social media, the less they change their behavior during the pandemic in terms of rejecting Covid-19 mitigation measures. Therefore, it is also more likely that people will follow the measures to mitigate the effects of coronavirus infection.
Publisher
State University of Management
Reference12 articles.
1. Lu G., Razum O., Jahn A., Zhanga Y., Sutton B., Sridhar D., Ariyoshi K., von Seidlein L., Müller O. Covid-19 in Germany and China: mitigation versus elimination strategy. Global health action. 2021;14:1–11.
2. Blom A.G. (the 21st of August 2020). Federal Agency for Civic Education in Germany. How society is coping with the coronavirus pandemic. Results of the Mannheim study [Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Zum gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit der Corona-Pandemie. Ergebnisse der Mannheimer Corona-Studie]. https://m.bpb.de/apuz/314345/zum-gesellschaftlichen-umgang-mit-der-corona-pandemie (accessed 29.03.2023).
3. Moser D.A., Glaus J., Frangou S., Schechter D.S. Years of life lost due to the psychosocial consequences of Covid-19 mitigation strategies based on Swiss data. European Psychiatry. 2020;63(1):1–7.
4. Haleem A., Javaid M., Viashya R. Effects of Covid-19 pandemic in daily life. Current medicine research and practice. 2020;10 (2):78–79.
5. Abu-Akel A., Spitz A., West R. The effect of spokesperson attribution on public health message sharing during the Covid-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(2): e0245100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245100