Office 4.0 – modern office digital technology, relevant to the post-COVID era

Author:

Vasilieva E. V.1ORCID,Dolganova O. I.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Financial University

Abstract

The COVID-19 epidemic forced most employers to transfer employees to a remote format, and after the restrictions were lifted, many companies retained this regime. Therefore, an urgent topic today is the discussion of the question of whether the hybrid or online format will remain as established forms of interaction between people. The purpose of the study is to identify the main problems in corporate governance that arose during the forced transfer of some of the personnel to a remote work format and to show the possibilities of their solution based on digital tools. Coordination of work in a team affects not so much the productivity of each employee as the formation of a general vision of the situation, the quality of setting and solving problems, the presence of informal communications and the stability of horizontal ties, and the support and adaptation of new team members. To substantiate the choice of a hybrid office, expert assessments and the method of analysing hierarchies have been applied. The article provides a list of tools that ensure the operation of a hybrid office, formulates their advantages and development prospects. The possibility of assessing the effectiveness of such decisions using the total cost of ownership methodology on the example of introducing a biometrics system in a bank has been shown.

Publisher

State University of Management

Reference21 articles.

1. Vasileva E. V., Altuhova N. F., Deeva E. A. [et al]. Economics of information systems: management and performance evaluation. Moscow, KNORUS, 2020, 624 p. (In Russian).

2. Dolganova O. I. Assessment of the feasibility of using RPA technologies to improve auxiliary processes, Operational and Project Management: Strategies and Trends: Collection of Conference Proceedings (Moscow, September 22, 2020). Moscow, KnoRus, 2021, pp.16–22. (In Russian).

3. Evlanov L. G., Kutuzov V. A. Expert assessments in management. Moscow, Ekonomika, 1978, 133 p. (In Russian).

4. Madera A. G. Modeling and decision-making in management: A guide for future top managers. Moscow, LKI Publ. House, 2017, 688 p. (In Russian).

5. Petrovskaya N. E. The impact of new technologies and robotics on employment in the United States. Upravlenie, 2020, no. 8 (3), pp. 81–90. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2020-8-3-81-90.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3