Abstract
Türkiye has implemented different exchange rate regimes and foreign trade policies throughout its 100-year history. The foreign trade deficit has been a persistent issue since the establishment of the free-market economy and its opening to foreign capital and aid. Since 1980, export-oriented industrialization policies and the withdrawal of the fixed exchange rate regime have not effectively reduced the foreign trade deficit. This study used the VAR model to examine the relationship between the real effective exchange rate, exports, and imports from March 2001 to June 2023. To investigate the causality between variables, Granger causality test is performed; impulse response functions are used to establish the direction of the variables' reaction to shocks; and variance decomposition is used to evaluate the distribution of impact over periods. The study's findings contradict economic theory's predictions about exchange rate, export, and import linkages. The Granger causality test failed to identify a causal relationship between the real effective exchange rate and exports and imports, leading to the conclusion that the level of the exchange rate has no influence on exports and imports. The bidirectional causation between exports and imports, with import changes largely explained by exports, confirms Türkiye's export dependence on imports
Publisher
Ekonomi Politika ve Finanas Arastirmalari Dergisi
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Economics and Econometrics,Media Technology,Forestry
Reference23 articles.
1. Altın, H. and Süslü, C. (2017). Türkiye için döviz kuru, ihracat ve ithalat arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 105-112. Retrieved from http://aksarayiibd.aksaray.edu.tr/tr/
2. Ataç, K. (2003). Dalgalı kur politikası bir çözüm olabilir mi? Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 15-23. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/huniibf
3. Aytekin, I. and Uçan, O. (2022). Döviz kuru enflasyon ve dış ticaret arasındaki ilişkinin ekonometrik bir analizi: Türkiye örneği. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2). 460-475. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1009183
4. Balcilar, M., Bal, H., Algan, N. and Demiral, M. (2014). Turkey’s export performance: Examining the main determinants of export volume (1995-2012). Ege Academic Review, 14(3), 451-462. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eab
5. Berument, M.H., Denaux, Z.S. and Yalcin, Y. (2015). The inconsistent response of Turkish export demand to real exchange rate shocks. Global Journal of Business Research, 9(1), 49-56. Retrieved from https://www.theibfr.com/gjbr/
Bozdan, D.N., Özenci, I. and Benli, Y.K. (2018). Döviz kuru ile ihracat ve ithalat arasındaki ilişkinin analizi: Ampirik bir çalışma. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(25), 638-649. https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.457585