Abstract
This article analyzes how public policymakers responded to CCCC’s 1988 National Language Policy. While many treated CCCC as a leading critic of English-only policies, others interpreted the organization to be more of a hesitant critic, or even an outright ally of the English-only movement. Rather than cede rhetorical ground to monolingual ideologies, policies, and movements, I argue for language policies that place less emphasis on English and more on language as a right and a translingual practice.
Publisher
National Council of Teachers of English
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Language and Linguistics,Education
Reference76 articles.
1. Reframing Writing Assessment to Improve Teaching and Learning
2. “Clarifying the Relationship between L2 Writing and Translingual Writing: An Open Letter to Writing Studies Editors and Organization Leaders.”;Atkinson;College English,2015