Affiliation:
1. University of Arizona
2. University of California Santa Cruz
Abstract
This article reports findings from a qualitative study in a third-grade classroom in the Southwest in the wake of Donald Trump’s campaign and inauguration. In response to students’ concerns about Trump’s rhetoric around immigration and border-wall construction, the teacher provided curricular space for students to study immigration policy and write letters to their congressional representative expressing their positions. Drawing on field notes, interviews, and student writing, this study asks, (a) What sources of knowledge did students draw on in their talk and writing? and (b) How did students respond to such curricular design? Analysis suggests that students drew on border thinking () and politicized funds of knowledge (), positioned themselves as change agents, and developed and displayed knowledge of academic genres and conventions.
Publisher
National Council of Teachers of English
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Education,Language and Linguistics
Reference75 articles.
1. American Civil Liberties Union;ACLU factsheet on Customs and Border Protection’s 100-mile zone
2. High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis;Au;Educational Researcher,2007
3. We were marching for our equal rights”: Political literacies in the early childhood classroom;Bentley;Found in translation: How language shapes our lives and transforms the world,2017
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献