Challenging the Islamic City Paradigm: A Trial for Ottoman Urban Spaces through the Lens of Collective Action Theory

Author:

KARAKAŞ DEMİR Handan1

Affiliation:

1. Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi

Abstract

This article focuses on collective actions in Ottoman cities to respond to the Weberian notion of the Islamic city, suggesting Islamic city dwellers’ incapability to act collectively. For this purpose, the study scrutinizes the collective appeals made by city dwellers to Ottoman courts, employing Charles Tilly’s theory of collective action. By conducting an extensive literature review of the Islamic city paradigm and analyzing court records, this article argues that Ottoman city dwellers possessed urban consciousness and engaged in collective actions for the betterment of their living environment, challenging the belief that such actions were absent in Muslim societies. Studies on this topic so far have neither employed a comprehensive theoretical approach nor have they considered the place dimension. Furthermore, this article suggests that essential indicators of Ottoman cities’ urban culture are joint decision-making, apprehension of urban problems, organizational capacity, and collective actions.

Publisher

Bilig, Journal of Social Sciences of Turkish World

Subject

General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities

Reference66 articles.

1. Abu-Lughod, Janet L. “The Islamic City—Historic Myth, Islamic Essence, and Contemporary Relevance.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, vol. 19, no. 2, 1987, pp. 155-176. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/163352.

2. Afyoncu, Erhan. “Türkiye’de Tahrir Defterlerine Dayalı Olarak Hazırlanmış Çalışmalar Hakkında Bazı Görüşler.” Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 1, 2003, pp. 267-286, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/talid/issue/43380/528509.

3. Akarlı, Engin Deniz. “Maslaha from ‘Common Good’ to ‘Raison D’etat’ in the Experience of Istanbul Artisans, 1730-1840.” Hoca, ‘Allame Puits de Science: Essays in Honor of Kemal H. Karpat, ed. Kaan Durukan et al., The Isis Press, 2010, pp. 63-79.

4. Akşin, Sina. “Kent Tarihi Nasıl Dönemlenmeli?” Kent Tarihçiliği: Kent Tarihleri Atölyesi. Toplu Konut İdaresi/Tarih Vakfı, 1994.

5. Atabey, Halil. Manisa’nın 79 Numaralı Şer’iyye Sicil Defteri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, 2014.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3