Big Data, Digitization and New Surveillance Practices: New Decision-Making Culture and Panoptic Classification

Author:

ÖZUZ DAĞDELEN Elif1ORCID,POYRAZ Tuğça2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

Big data brings along a new decision-making culture through data mining aided decision-making mechanisms. One of the biggest sources of this mechanism is meta-data and that creates a suitable condition for mass-monitoring surveillance. The belief in these systems creates a discussion about usage of big data as a social classification tool, big data hubris, and big data divide. The aim of this study is to discuss the possible destructive results of big data especially as a social classification tool and new surveillance practices. In that point, this study focuses on the idea that big data paves the way to the new surveillance or dragnet surveillance practices and the possibility of social classification, and these might construct a world of increasing disadvantage. Through this panoptic sort, it comes with the problem of a serious power imbalance, simplification and decontextualization. It might result in the danger of loss of privacy and erosion of long-term privacy norms, a routine classification, manipulation of the future behaviors, antidemocratic control system, panoptic missort, data-antisubordination, abuse of civil rights and security problems.

Publisher

Hacettepe University

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference31 articles.

1. Andrejevic, M. (2014). Big data, big questions: The big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8(17), 1673-1689.

2. Andrejevic, M., & Gates, K. (2014). Big data surveillance: Introduction. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 185-196.

3. Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2020). Akışkan Gözetim. (E. Yılmaz, Trans.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.

4. Bentham, J., & Božovič, M. (1995). The panopticon writings. Verso Trade.

5. Blevins, J. L. (2017). Panoptic missorts and the hegemony of US data privacy policy. The Political Economy of Communication, 4(2), 18-33.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3