Terrorism and its global biomedical consequences (2011 to 2020)

Author:

Evdokimov V. I.1ORCID,Shulenin N. S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, EMERCOM of Russia

2. Saint Petersburg Medico-Social Institute

Abstract

Relevance. Global terrorist activity is still far from decreasing, demanding extra studies regarding the risk indicators and compelling the countries to unite their efforts to combat terrorism across the world.The study objective is to analyze worldwide biomedical consequences of terrorism from 2011 to 2020 in order to optimize counterterrorism activities.Methods. The study analyzed global indicators of terrorist activities collected in the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) [https://www.start.umd.edu/]. The analyses focused on structure, dynamics and risks regarding fatalities and casualties (injuries) of terrorist attacks (TAs), including by type of attack, weapon, and incident location. The risk analysis focused on the risk of being affected by terrorist attack (death or injury) per 1 million of global population (Ч10-6). Mean data, the upper and lower quartiles, and the median were calculated (Me [Q1; Q3]).Results and analysis. From 2011 to 2020 the world’s annual average number of TAs was 110 thousand, or 10.7 [8.5; 14.1] thousand, with 25.8 thousand, or 23.1 [20.4; 35.3] thousand of people killed and 28.4 thousand, or 25.5 [18.8; 40.6] thousand of people affected. The polynomial trendlines for these indicators are inverted U-curves, showing less data in the latest observation period. TAs without biomedical consequences account for about 50%. However, the most severe medical and biological consequences were associated with the use of explosives and firearms, responsible for 84.4 % of all deaths and 91.4 % of all injuries. Massive sanitary losses associated with this type of TAs are a major challenge for medical care providers. 91.4 % of all TAs targeted military personnel, police officers, individual residents (or bystanders), government and business officials, responsible for 86.8% of all deaths and 84.2 % of all injuries. These population cohorts were in the risk groups for terrorism. The average individual risk of TA exposure among the world population stood at 1.49 • 10–6 incidents/(person • year), with the risk of death 3.49 • 10–6 deaths/(person • year) and trauma (injury) 3.87 • 10–6 injuries/(person • year). Meanwhile, according to the calculations by the International Labour Organization, the global average annual risk of death due to occupational injury for the same timespan (2011–2020) was by factors higher and amounted to (3.83 ± 0.13) • 10–4 deaths/(person • year).Conclusion. Terrorism is pursuing social instability, intimidation, and engulfing panic among the population, rather than medical and biological consequences. Considering that terrorism is impossible to eradicate completely across the world, it can be minimized by optimizing counterterrorism activities, based on TA weapon information or incident location.

Publisher

NRCERM EMERCOM of Russia

Reference14 articles.

1. Akimov V.A. Obshhaja teorija bezopasnosti zhiznedejatel’nosti v sovremennoj nauchnoj kartine mira [The general theory of life safety in the modern scientific picture of the world]. Moscow. 2018. 136 p. (In Russ.)

2. Evdokimov V.I., Bobrinev E.V., Kondashov A.A. Analiz proizvodstvennogo travmatizma i gibeli lichnogo sostava Federal’noj protivopozharnoj sluzhby MChS Rossii (2006–2020 gg.) [Analysis of occupational injury and mortality of personnel of the Federal Fire Service of the EMERCOM of Russia (2006–2020)]: monograph. Scientific. ed. V.I. Evdokimov. St. Petersburg. 2022. 138 p.

3. Evdokimov V.I., Chernov K.A. Mediko-biologicheskie posledstvija terrorizma v Rossii i mire (2005–2018 gg.) [Medical and biological consequences of terrorism in Russia and worldwide (2005–2018)]. Mediko-biologicheskie i sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problemy bezopasnosti v chrezvychaynykh situatsiyakh [Medico-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations]. 2020; (1):85–118. DOI: 10.25016/2541-7487-2020-0-1-85-118. (In Russ.)

4. Rjazanov D.S., Ohrimenko A.V. Ispol’zovanie jelektronnyh baz dannyh v issledovanii terrorizma [Use of electronic data bases in investigation of terrorism]. Manuskript [Manuscript]. 2015; (11-2): 172–176. (In Russ.)

5. Holmatova K.K., Grjibovski A.M. Panel’nye issledovanija i issledovanija trenda v medicine i obshhestvennom zdravoohranenii [Panel and trend studies in medicine and public health]. Jekologija cheloveka [Human ecology]. 2016; (10):57–63. DOI: 10.33396/1728-0869-2016-9-57-64. (In Russ.)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Analysis and optimization of global terrorism index indicators;Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations;2024-06-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3