Affiliation:
1. School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, UK
Abstract
TCCs are seen to be a procurement model capable of achieving value for money through aligning the objectives of the parties to reduce costs. The use of Target Cost Contracts (TCCs) within the UK construction industry has increased dramatically over the past few years. TCCs have been employed successfully on recent large scale projects such as Heathrow Terminal 5, Crossrail Procurement Strategy and the 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Infrastructure. Due to the success of TCCs over recent years, many clients are now turning to them in a bid to obtain value for money. However, it seems that they do not always drive parties to minimise costs and provide value for money. This research paper investigates the extent to which TCCs promote collaborative behaviours and provide value for money within the UK construction industry. More particularly, the research explores the following: which projects TCCs should be used on and how the maturity of the design when agreeing the target cost can affect value for money; how setting both the target cost and the pain/gain mechanism can affect the incentivisation of the contractor to minimise costs; the extent to which TCCs promote collaboration between the contractor, client and supply chain; and what is required to manage a TCC post-contract to ensure that incentivisation is maintained. It has become apparent from the research that TCCs are complex procurement models which require extensive consideration and management to ensure parties are incentivised to minimise costs. The research reveals that although TCCs can promote collaborative behaviours and provide value for money, there is a prerequisite to doing so: developing and managing the TCC correctly to ensure that the objectives of the parties are aligned.
Reference34 articles.
1. Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N. (2000). Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnerships and alliances. Construction Management and Economics, 18(5), 587-98.
2. Broome, J. (1999). The NEC Engineering and Construction Contract: A user’s guide. London: Thomas Telford Publishing.
3. Broome, J. (2002). Procurement Routes for Partnering: A Practical Guide. London: Thomas Telford Publishing.
4. Broome, J. and Perry, J. (2002). How practitioners set share fractions in target cost contracts. International Journal of Project Management. 20, 59-66.
5. Broome, J. (2013). How to intelligently set the Contractor’s share percentages and share ranges. Retrieved 20 February, 2017, from https://builtintelligence.com/blogs/opinions-blog/9101211-how-to-intelligently-set-the-contractor-s-share-percentages-and-share-ranges
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献