Affiliation:
1. Professor, American University in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Faculty of Finance, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Abstract
Influence of capital market on economic growth has been proven to be positive by majority empirical studies up to now. Throughout these studies, only secondary capital market indicators were usedwas extended with eight countries from Central and Eastern Europe to stabilize the model. A country dummy variable was used to distinguish between two regions. Data for panel regression was taken from GFDR, WDI (both from World Bank database) and one variable from UNECE. Results show that only market capitalization indicator is found to be significant, which is contrary to preliminary expectations. It was hard to expect secondary market activities to spur growth in transition countries, where primary issues almost do not exist. However, this result could be explained LSDVC regression tested endogeneity and reverse causality, and no significant reverse relationship was detected. The main conclusion of this study is that more qualitative research has to be done to discover the main limitations to capital market development in transition countries with more emphasis on primary issues, what could be of better use for policymakers.
Reference49 articles.
1. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Sayek, S. (2004). FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 89-112, October.
2. Arcand, J. Berkes, E. and Panizza, U. (2011). Too much finance? IMF Working Paper, WP/12/161
3. Atje, R., and Jovanovic, B. (1989). Stock markets and development. European Economic Review 37:632-640.
4. Atje, R., and Jovanovic, B. (1993). Stocks markets and development. European Economic Review, 1993, 37, pp.634-640.
5. Baltagi, H. (1995). Econometrics analysis of panel data. Econometrics Theory, Cambridge University, Vol. 13, 747-754.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献