On the inaccuracies of macroeconomic observations

Author:

van Bergeijk Peter A.G.

Abstract

<p>Transparency about measurement errors in macroeconomic statistics is lacking. Inaccuracy is usually acknowledged only during extraordinary situations or under specific policy demands. Despite advances in technology and methodology, the overall accuracy has not improved due to economic changes and new complex activities. Even striking historical efforts did not change the persistence of substantial inaccuracies and biases. While the pioneers of national accounting addressed inaccuracies by using multiple accounting approaches and transparently reported error estimates, current statistical offices and other data producers rarely publish error measures, thereby creating an illusion of precision. Best practices and new measurement methods, such as satellite observation, Big Data, and Artificial Intelligence, promise improvements but face significant challenges without clear standards and an awareness of measurement error and bias. Regular and transparent reporting of measurement errors is and will be essential to improve the data reliability. Empowering data users—funding agencies, academics, and journalists—through error reporting and education can challenge the status quo.</p>

Publisher

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)

Reference48 articles.

1. Abeln B, Jacobs JPAM (2022) COVID-19 and seasonal adjustment. J Bus Cycle Res 18: 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41549-022-00071-z

2. Akritidis L (2002) Accuracy assessment of National Accounts statistics. Economic Trends, 38–53. Available from: https://escoe-website.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/01233815/ET-589-Accuracy-assessment-of-national-accounts-statistics-L-Akritidis-Dec-2002.pdf.

3. Biddle J, Boumans M (2021) Exploring the History of Statistical Inference in Economics: Introduction. Hist Polit Econ 53: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-9414747

4. Bos F (2009) The National Accounts as a Tool for Analysis and Policy: In View of History, Economic Theory and Data Compilation Issue.

5. Boskin MJ, Dulberger ER, Gordon RJ, et al. (1996) Toward a more accurate measure of the cost of living: final report to the Senate Finance Committee, Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index, United States Congress, Washington D.C. Available from: https://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/boskinrpt.html.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3