Author:
Buratti Marco,Jungnickel Dieter
Abstract
<p style='text-indent:20px;'>Two years ago, we alarmed the scientific community about the large number of bad papers in the literature on <i>zero difference balanced functions</i>, where direct proofs of seemingly new results are presented in an unnecessarily lengthy and convoluted way. Indeed, these results had been proved long before and very easily in terms of difference families.</p><p style='text-indent:20px;'>In spite of our report, papers of the same kind continue to proliferate. Regrettably, a further attempt to put the topic in order seems unavoidable. While some authors now follow our recommendation of using the terminology of <i>partitioned difference families</i>, their methods are still the same and their results are often trivial or even wrong. In this note, we show how a very recent paper of this type can be easily dealt with.</p>
Publisher
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics,Computer Networks and Communications,Algebra and Number Theory,Applied Mathematics,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics,Computer Networks and Communications,Algebra and Number Theory
Reference15 articles.
1. R. J. R. Abel and M. Buratti, Difference families, in Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, Second Edition, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, (2007), 392–410.
2. T. Beth, D. Jungnickel, H. Lenz., Design Theory, ${ref.volume} (1986).
3. R. C. Bose, W. S. Connor.Combinatorial properties of group divisible incomplete block designs, Ann. Math. Stat., 23 (1952), 367-383.
4. M. Buratti.On disjoint (v, k, k-1) difference families, Des. Codes Cryptogr., 87 (2019), 745-755.
5. M. Buratti, D. Jungnickel.Partitioned difference families versus zero difference balanced functions, Des. Codes Cryptogr., 87 (2019), 2461-2467.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献