Author:
Hamilton Sarah J.,Isaacson David,Kolehmainen Ville,Muller Peter A.,Toivanen Jussi,Bray Patrick F.
Abstract
<p style='text-indent:20px;'>The first numerical implementation of a <inline-formula><tex-math id="M2">\begin{document}$ \mathbf{t}^{\rm{{\textbf{exp}}}} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> method in 3D using simulated electrode data is presented. Results are compared to Calderón's method as well as more common TV and smoothness regularization-based methods. The <inline-formula><tex-math id="M3">\begin{document}$ \mathbf{t}^{\rm{{\textbf{exp}}}} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> method for EIT is based on tailor-made non-linear Fourier transforms involving the measured current and voltage data. Low-pass filtering in the non-linear Fourier domain is used to stabilize the reconstruction process. In 2D, <inline-formula><tex-math id="M4">\begin{document}$ \mathbf{t}^{\rm{{\textbf{exp}}}} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> methods have shown great promise for providing robust real-time absolute and time-difference conductivity reconstructions but have yet to be used on practical electrode data in 3D, until now. Results are presented for simulated data for conductivity and permittivity with disjoint non-radially symmetric targets on spherical domains and noisy voltage data. The 3D <inline-formula><tex-math id="M5">\begin{document}$ \mathbf{t}^{\rm{{\textbf{exp}}}} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> and Calderón methods are demonstrated to provide comparable quality to their 2D counterparts and hold promise for real-time reconstructions due to their fast, non-optimized, computational cost.</p><p style='text-indent:20px;'> </p><p style='text-indent:20px;'>Erratum: The name of the fifth author has been corrected from Jussi Toivainen to Jussi Toivanen. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.</p>
Publisher
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
Subject
Control and Optimization,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics,Modeling and Simulation,Analysis,Control and Optimization,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics,Modelling and Simulation,Analysis
Reference65 articles.
1. A. Adler, J. H. Arnold, R. Bayford, A. Borsic, B. Brown, P. Dixon, T. J. Faes, I. Frerichs, H. Gagnon, Y. Gärber and B. Grychtol, GREIT: A unified approach to 2d linear EIT reconstruction of lung images, Physiological Measurement, 30 (2009), S35–S55.
2. M. Alsaker, S. J. Hamilton, A. Hauptmann.A direct D-bar method for partial boundary data Electrical Impedance Tomography with a priori information, Inverse Problems and Imaging, 11 (2017), 427-454.
3. G. Alessandrini.Stable determination of conductivity by boundary measurements, Applicable Analysis, 27 (1988), 153-172.
4. M. Alsaker, J. L. Mueller.A D-bar algorithm with a priori information for 2-dimensional electrical impedance tomography, SIAM J. on Imaging Sciences, 9 (2016), 1619-1654.
5. M. Alsaker and J. L. Mueller, EIT images of human inspiration and expiration using a D-bar method with spatial priors, Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, 34 (2019).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献