Author:
Salas Eric Ariel L.,Kumaran Sakthi Subburayalu,Bennett Robert,Willis Leeoria P.,Mitchell Kayla
Abstract
<abstract>
<p>Wetlands are invaluable ecosystems, offering essential services such as carbon sequestration, water purification, flood control and habitat for countless aquatic species. However, these critical environments are under increasing threat from factors like industrialization and agricultural expansion. In this research, we focused on small-sized wetlands, typically less than 10 acres in size, due to their unique ecological roles and groundwater recharge contributions. To effectively protect and manage these wetlands, precise mapping and monitoring are essential. To achieve this, we exploited the capabilities of Sentinel-2 imagery and employ a range of machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest (RF), Classification and Regression Tree (CART), Gradient Tree Boost (GTB), Naive Bayes (NB), k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Our evaluation used variables, such as spectral bands, indices and image texture. We also utilized Google Earth Engine (GEE) for streamlined data processing and visualization. We found that Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Tree Boost (GTB) outperformed other classifiers according to the performance evaluation. The Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) came out to be one of the important predictors in mapping wetlands. By exploring the synergistic potential of these algorithms, we aim to address existing gaps and develop an optimized approach for accurate small-sized wetland mapping. Our findings will be useful in understanding the value of small wetlands and their conservation in the face of environmental challenges. They will also lay the framework for future wetland research and practical uses.</p>
</abstract>
Publisher
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
Reference47 articles.
1. Finlayson CM, Davidson NC, Spiers AG, et al. (1999) Global wetland inventory – current status and future priorities. Mar Freshwater Res 50: 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF99098
2. Kotze DC, Ellery WN, Macfarlane DM, et al. (2012) A rapid assessment method for coupling anthropogenic stressors and wetland ecological condition. Ecol Indic 13: 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.023
3. Dahl T, Allord G Technical Aspects of Wetlands. History of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States. Available from: https://water.usgs.gov/nwsum/WSP2425/history.html.
4. Darrah SE, Shennan-Farpón Y, Loh J, et al. (2019) Improvements to the Wetland Extent Trends (WET) index as a tool for monitoring natural and human-made wetlands. Ecol Indic 99: 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.032
5. Davey Resource Group (2006) GIS Wetlands Inventory and Restoration Assessment, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Cuyahoga Soil and Water Conservation District.