Affiliation:
1. The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan
2. Laboratory of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan
3. Laboratory of Farm Business Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan
Abstract
<abstract>
<p>Rice cultivation has played a pivotal role in Guyana's agricultural history, contributing significantly to both sustenance and economic prosperity for over two centuries. Accounting for 3.3% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) and a substantial 20.5% of the agricultural GDP, the rice industry has faced challenges influenced by various global and domestic factors, impacting the productivity and profitability of rice farmers. One key influencing factor is contract farming, involving agreements between farmers and firms that outline production and marketing conditions for agricultural products. In Guyana's rice industry, contract farming is prevalent, but challenges such as unequal bargaining power and discrepancies in weights and prices persist. Notably, using two pricing standards, high-price and low-price, further complicates the understanding of contract farming's impact on rice cultivation. We delved into the role and impact of contract farming on rice cultivation in Guyana, with a specific focus on the Mahaica-Berbice and Essequibo Islands-West Demerara regions. In this study, conducted with 121 farmers using systematic sampling, we used profitability assessment, frequency distribution, and binary logistic regression analyses. The findings revealed that high-price contracts contributed to greater farmer profitability compared to low-price contracts. Despite this, low-price contracts persisted due to factors such as risk-sharing, access to credit, and fertilizers. Moreover, pricing standards influenced farmer behavior, with low-price contracts prompting crop diversification to supplement income. These insights underscored the significance of pricing standards in determining the effectiveness of contract farming and its impact on farmers' livelihoods. Policymakers and stakeholders can leverage these findings to design more effective contract farming models, enhancing farmers' profitability and contributing to sustainable agricultural development. Furthermore, future research may explore the impact of farmers' organization membership on contract farming productivity, providing additional depth to our understanding of this crucial agricultural practice.</p>
</abstract>
Publisher
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
Reference41 articles.
1. Ministry of Agriculture Cooperative Republic of Guyana, Rice yield sees significant growth in Guyana–Min. Holder (2019) Available from: https://agriculture.gov.gy/2019/10/11/rice-yield-sees-significant-growth-in-guyana-min-holder.
2. Wenner MD, Rogers R, Clarke D (2016) Guyana's PetroCaribe Rice Compensation Scheme Has Ended: Assessment and Policy Implications. Inter-American Development Bank.
3. Roy E (1963) Contract Farming, Denville Illinois, U.S.A. The Interstate Printers and Publishers Inc.
4. Gillette R, Sakai N (2021) The profitability of rice contract farming in Guyana. A case study of Mahaica Berbice. Jpn J Farm Manag 59: 145–150. https://doi.org/10.11300/fmsj.59.2_145
5. Minot N, Sawyer B (2016) Chapter 4—Contract farming in developing countries: Theory, practice, and policy implications. In: Devaux A, Torero M, Donovan J, et al. (Eds.), Innovation for inclusive value-chain development: Successes and challenges, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 127–158.