Listen to the radio and go on field trips: A study on farmers' attributes to opt for extension methods in Northwest Ethiopia

Author:

Gebremariam Yemane Asmelash12,Dessein Joost2,Wondimagegnhu Beneberu Assefa3,Breusers Mark4,Lenaerts Lutgart2,Adgo Enyew5,Van Passel Steven6,Minale Amare Sewnet7,Frankl Amaury8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rural Development and Agricultural Extension, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia

2. Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Belgium

3. Policy Studies Institute Ethiopia, Economic sectors policy studies, Ethiopia

4. Institute for Anthropological Research in Africa, KU Leuven, Belgium

5. Department of Natural Resource Management, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia

6. Department of Engineering Management, University of Antwerp, Belgium

7. Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia

8. Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Abstract

<abstract> <p>Extension professionals are expected to help disseminate agricultural technologies, information, knowledge and skills to farmers. In order to develop valuable and long-lasting extension services, it is essential to understand the methods of extension that farmers find most beneficial. This understanding helps adopt improved practices, overcome barriers, provide targeted interventions and continuously improve agricultural extension programs. Thus, assessing factors affecting farmers' choice of agricultural extension methods is essential for developing extension methods that comply with farmers' needs and socio-economic conditions. Therefore, we analyzed the factors affecting farmers' preferences in extension methods, using cross-sectional data collected from 300 households in two sample districts and 16 Kebelles in Ethiopia between September 2019 and March 2020. Four extension methods, including training, demonstration, office visits and phone calls were considered as outcome variables. We fitted a multivariate probit model to estimate the factors that influence farmers' choice of extension methods. The results of the study showed that the number of dependents in the household head, formal education and membership of Idir (an informal insurance program a community or group runs to meet emergencies) were negatively associated with farmers' choices to participate in different extension methods compared to no extension. On the other hand, the sex of the household head, farm experience, participation in non-farm activities, monetary loan access, owning a mobile phone, radio access and membership of cooperatives were found to have a statistically significant positive impact on farmers' choices of extension methods. Based on these findings, the government and the concerned stakeholders should take farmers' socio-economic and institutional traits into account when selecting and commissioning agricultural extension methods. This could help to develop contextually relevant extension strategies that are more likely to be chosen and appreciated by farmers. Furthermore, such strategies can aid policymakers in designing extension programs that cater to farmers' needs and concerns. In conclusion, farmers' socio-economic and institutional affiliation should be taken into consideration when selecting agricultural extension methods.</p> </abstract>

Publisher

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)

Subject

Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Food Science

Reference83 articles.

1. Albore A (2018) Review on role and challenges of agricultural extension service on farm productivity in Ethiopia. Int J Agric Educ Ext 4: 93–100.

2. Elias A, Nohmi M, Yasunobu K, et al. (2016) Farmers' satisfaction with agricultural extension service and its influencing factors: a case study in North West Ethiopia. J Agric Sci Technol 18: 39–53.

3. Mutengwa CS, Mnkeni P, Kondwakwenda A (2023) Climate-smart agriculture and food security in Southern Africa: A review of the vulnerability of smallholder agriculture and food security to climate change. Sustainability 15: 2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042882

4. Swanson BE, Rajalahti R (2010) Strengthening agricultural extension and advisory systems: Procedures for assessing, transforming, and evaluating extension systems. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper, No. 45. World Bank, Washington, DC.

5. Takahashi K, Muraoka R, Otsuka K (2020) Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries' agriculture: A review of the recent literature. Agric Econ 51: 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12539

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3