Affiliation:
1. Doctoral school of Economics and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life sciences, Hungary
2. Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Szent István Campus, Hungary
3. Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Szent István Campus, Hungary
Abstract
<abstract>
<p>The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential opportunities and challenges of plastic products in Ethiopia. The study is qualitative in nature and a descriptive research design with the in-depth interview was used. The study employed both primary and secondary sources of data to investigate the study on hand. More specifically purposive sampling techniques were used to select the respondents for the interview. Discourse analysis was used in the study to recognize discursive interaction as a valuable tool for determining opinions, ideas, and facts about plastic products in Ethiopia. The study developed two different storylines regarding the opportunities and challenges of plastic products. As a result, the first storyline (S1) used taxing plastic products as an alternative strategy. The second storyline (S2) used banning plastic products as opoosing strategy. The study finding implies that having a tax on plastic products could provide more opportunities for the country than banning them. More specifically, taxing plastic products will be more appropriate for the generation of revenue, employment, industrial process, construction process, and recycling in Ethiopia. On the other hand, a lack of proper collection systems, separation of the source of disposal, a properly designed operating system, clear authorities and sanitation rules, organizational capacity, and unreliable collection services were found to existing challenges of plastic products. Governments and policymakers shall play a critical role in developing the necessary legislative framework to encourage mitigation actions that contribute to the reduction of plastic waste at the source, as well as encouraging the cleanup of plastic pollution on coastlines. Public discussion on alternative packaging than the one-time use of plastic products is also needed. Public awareness is required to change customer attitudes, and separation of organic and non-organic waste across the cities.</p>
</abstract>
Publisher
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
Subject
General Environmental Science
Reference27 articles.
1. Neto AM, Gomes TS, Pertel M, et al. (2021) An overview of plastic straw policies in the Americas. Marine Pollution Bulletin 172: 112813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112813
2. Leal Filho W, Saari U, Fedoruk M, et al. (2019) An overview of the problems posed by plastic products and the role of extended producer responsibility in Europe. Journal of cleaner production 214: 550-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.256
3. Liu C, Nguyen TT, Ishimura Y, et.al (2021) Current situation and key challenges on the use of single-use plastic in Hanoi. Waste Management 121: 422-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.033
4. Leonard S, Barra R (2018) Plastics and the Circular Economy. Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel to the Global Environment Facility. The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) to the Global Environment Facility.
5. Dikgang J, Leiman A, Visser M (2012) Analysis of the plastic-bag levy in South Africa. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 66: 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.009
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献