Author:
Blakeman Evelyn,Wilson Aydan B.,Romer Sarah,Olin Emi,Scott Catherine,Popescu Viorel,Brodie Bekka
Abstract
Flies (Diptera) represent one of the largest and most important groups of pollinators on the planet; however, little is known about the interactions between flies and flowers compared to well-known pollinators, such as bees. Understanding pollinator assemblages is key to conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services, but monitoring Diptera is time and cost intensive. Using photographs of blooming flowers taken by photographers worldwide and uploaded on internet repositories, we built a dataset of 1,275 images of fly-flower visitations and extracted fly and flower taxonomic information, flower characteristics (shape and color), and fly activity (pollen carrying and foraging). The resulting dataset shows taxonomic and other biases but can still provide an initial overview of factors that affect pollination by Diptera. We identified 22 families of flies, with blow flies (Family Calliphoridae) most represented (29%) and 63 families of flowers, with Asteraceae (42%) and Apiaceae (21%) as the most common. Using logistic regression, we found that the likelihood of flies carrying pollen was determined by the interaction between flower color and shape: pollen-carrying was more likely when elongate cluster flowers were green-yellow. Fly foraging on flowers was determined by flower color: flies were more likely to feed on green-yellow and white flowers. Overall, Syrphidae flies were less likely to forage for nectar than non-Syrphidae, but were more likely to carry pollen. While biases exist in crowdsourced data, we show that data from photographs collected through citizen science offers potentially valuable information for monitoring pollinator-flower interactions and augment our understanding of pollinator ecology in an era of global insect declines.
Publisher
International Commission for Plant Pollinator Relations
Subject
Insect Science,Plant Science,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference68 articles.
1. Arnold SEJ, Savolainen V, Chittka L (2009) Flower colours along an alpine altitude gradient, seen through the eyes of fly and bee pollinators. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 3:27–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-009-9056-9
2. Bahlai CA, Landis DA (2016) Predicting plant attractiveness to pollinators with passive crowdsourcing. Royal Society Open Science 3:150677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150677
3. Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemüller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE. (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science (1979) 313:351-354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127863
4. Blakeman E, Aydan B. Wilson, Sarah Romer, Emi Olin, Catherine E. Scott, D. Viorel Popescu, & Bekka Brodie. (2023). Data set of 1,275 images capturing interactions between flies and blooming flowers [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8221822
5. Brodie BS, Smith MA, Lawrence J, Gries G (2015) Effects of floral scent, colour and pollen on foraging decisions and oocyte development of common green bottle flies. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0145055 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145055
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献