Affiliation:
1. A.N. Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry Ural Branch of RAS
Abstract
Research subject. Main problems of the General Stratigraphic Scale (GSS) of the Upper Precambrian including uncertainties in the hierarchy of subdivisions are analyzed.Results. Prospects for detailing the Upper Precambrian GSS are discussed, along with questions of its correlation with International Chronostratigraphic Chart (ICSC) and establishing the lower boundaries of chronostratigraphic subdivisions. The importance of unifying the existing views is emphasized.Conclusions. It is proposed to carry out the following reforms of GSS: to abolish Acrothemes / Acrons; to approve the Proterozoic (as well as the Archean) as an Eonotheme / Eon; to minimize the use of terms “Upper Proterozoic” and “Lower Proterozoic”; to assign the Riphean and Vendian to the rank of Erathem / Era (while preserving the status of the Vendian as a System / Period); to consider Burzyanian, Yurmatinian, Karatavian and Arshinian as Systems / Periods of the Riphean. Attention is focused on the Upper Riphean-Vendian interval. The lower boundary of the Upper Riphean (Karatavian) was proposed to establish according to the first appearance of the Trachyhystrichosphaera sp. microfossils. Then, the Terminal Riphean (Arshinian) lower boundary should be traced to the base of the tillites formed during the global Sturtian glaciation (which approximately corresponds to the base of the Cryogenian in ICSC). Apparently, the Vendian lower boundary may be raised to the level of the top of the Gaskiers tillites, as the deposits of the last major glaciation in the Precambrian. The indicated proposals are substantiated. It is necessary to form work groups to develop solutions.
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Economics and Econometrics,Media Technology,Forestry
Reference145 articles.
1. Becker Yu.R. (1968) Late Precambrian molasse of the Southern Urals. Lеningrad, Nedra Publ., 160 p. (In Russ.)
2. Becker R.T., Kaiser S.I., Aretz M. (2016) Review of chrono-, litho- and biostratigraphy across the global Hangenberg Crisis and Devonian–Carboniferous Boundary. Devonian climate, sea level and evolutionary events (Eds R.T. Becker, P. Königshof, C.E. Brett). Geol. Soc. London. Spec. Publ., 423, 355-386.
3. Beghin J., Storme J.-Y., Blanpied C., Gueneli N., BrocksJ.J., Poulton S.W., Javaux E.J. (2017) Microfossils from the late Mesoproterozoic – early Neoproterozoic Atar/El Mreïti Group, Taoudeni Basin, Mauritania, northwestern Africa. Prec. Res., 291, 63-82.
4. Bibikova E.V., Kirnozova T.I., Lazarev Yu.I., Makarov V.A., Nikolaev A.A. (1990) U-Pb isotopic age of Vepsian in Karelia. Dokl. AN SSSR, 310(1), 189-191. (In Russ.)
5. Bowring S.A., Grotzinger J.P., Condon D.J., Ramezani J., Newall M.J., Allen P.A. (2007) Geochronologic constraints on the chronostratigraphic framework of the Neoproterozoic Huqf Supergroup, Sultanate of Oman. Amer. J. Sci., 307, 1097-1145.