Affiliation:
1. V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, SB RAS
2. V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, SB RAS; A.N. Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, UB RAS
3. V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
4. V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, SB RAS; N.l. Dobretsov Geological institute, SB RAS
Abstract
Research subject. This paper presents the results of a study of minerals of the apatite group from aillikites of the Zima alkaline-ultramafic carbonatite complex. Aim. To determine the composition of apatites to characterize the studied rocks and to elucidate the patterns of element distribution in the magma of aillikites in the late crystallization stages. Materials and Methods. Minerals of the apatite group from 6 samples (4 from dikes of the Bol'shetagninsky massif, 1 from the Bushkanai dike, 1 from the Beloziminskaya pipe) were studied. The samples showed similar textural-structural features, differing in the mineral composition of the groundmass. Results. Minerals of the apatite group are widespread in the groundmass of all the studied rocks. They are characterized by idiomorphic, subidiomorphic crystals of homogeneous composition, 10-100 microns in size. Minerals of the apatite group were identified as fluorapatite and hydroxyapatite characterized by a significant SiO2 content (up to 5 wt %), low SrO content (up to 1.5 wt %) and REE2O3 (up to 2 wt %). The studied apatites also include MgO, FeO, Na2O, SO4, and CO3. Fluorapatites from dyke aillikites are characterized by a higher silicon content as compared to apatites from the Beloziminskiy pipe. Apatites from fresh aillikites of the Bushkanai dyke have a relatively higher content of Sr, REE, and F than minerals from serpentinized samples. Conclusions. The composition of the studied apatites has a lower Sr and Ba content than orangeite and lamproite apatites. In terms of Sr, Si and REE contents, the studied apatites are similar to kimberlite and ailikite apatites. Such a difference allows minerals of the apatite group to be used as an indicator mineral for classification of kimberlites and related rocks, but only in combination with petrography and composition of other minerals of the groundmass.
Subject
Stratigraphy,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geology,Geophysics
Reference38 articles.
1. Awonusi A., Morris M.D., Tecklenburg M.M.J. (2007) Carbonate Assignment and Calibration in the Raman Spectrum of Apatite. Calcified Tissue Int., 81(1), 46-52.
2. Bagdasarov Yu.A. (2001) Metallogeny of Carbonatite Complexes of Russia. Metallogeny of Magmatic Complexes of Within-Plate Geodynamic Settings. Moscow, GEOS Publ., 128-506. (In Russ).
3. Chakhmouradian A.R., Reguir E.P., Mitchell R.H. (2002) Strontium-apatite: New occurrences, and the extent of Sr-for-Ca substitution in apatite-group minerals. Can. Mineral., 40, 121-136.
4. Chakhmouradian A.R., Reguir E.P., Zaitsev A.N., Coikslan C., Xue C., Kynicky J., Mumin H., Yang P. (2017) Apatite in carbonatitic rocks: Compositional variation, zoning, element partitioning and petrogenetic significance. Lithos, 274-275, 188-213.
5. Comodi P., Liu Yu, Frezzotti M.L. (2001) Structural and vibrational behavior of fluorapatite with pressure. Part II: in situ micro-Raman spectroscopic investigation. Phys. Chem. Minerals, 28, 225-231.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献